Comparison of two methods of complete denture fabricatio

Not Applicable

Recruiting

• Conditions: Edentulism or teeth loss; C07.465.714.804

• Registration Number: RBR-494r9r
• Lead Sponsor: niversidade Federal de Alfenas

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Study Start: 2016-11-18
• Last Update Posted: 29 May 2023

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Sex: Not specified
• Target Recruitment: Not specified

Inclusion Criteria

Complete Edentulism (mandible or maxilla) for at least one year; Receptive and mentally agile; Availability to attend evaluations during the study period.

Exclusion Criteria

Uncontrolled systemic diseases; Temporomandibular disorders; Surgical Procedures.

Study & Design

• Study Type: Intervention
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Statistically significant differences of at least 5% on Oral Health-Related Quality of life (OHQL) of edentulous patients rehabilitated with complete dentures fabricate by different methods, traditional or simplied, at the different periods of evaluation (1, 3 or 6 months after prostheses placement). OHQL will be measured by the application of OHIP-EDENT questionnaire.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Statistically significant differences of at least 5% on satisfaction with treatment of edentulous patients rehabilitated with complete dentures fabricate by different methods, traditional or simplied, at the different periods of evaluation (1, 3 or 6 months after prostheses placement). ;Statistically significant differences of at least 5% on masticatory performance of edentulous patients rehabilitated with complete dentures fabricate by different methods, traditional or simplied, at the different periods of evaluation (1, 3 or 6 months after prostheses placement). ;Statistically significant differences of at least 5% on prostheses quality of edentulous patients rehabilitated with complete dentures fabricate by different methods, traditional or simplied, at the different periods of evaluation (1, 3 or 6 months after prostheses placement).