One-stage Versus Two-stage Inverted U-shaped Ridge Splitting
- Conditions
- Maxillary Ridge Augmentation
- Registration Number
- NCT04720495
- Lead Sponsor
- Hams Hamed Abdelrahman
- Brief Summary
Fourteen patients having anterior maxillary undercut defect were selected to match a list of inclusion and exclusion criteria.
The participants were randomly allocated using a computer system into two groups:
Group A undergo inverted U-shaped maxillary ridge splitting using piezotomes with simultaneous implant placement in the same surgery.
Group B undergo inverted U-shaped maxillary ridge splitting as a first stage and after four weeks, ridge expansion and implant placement will be performed with only envelop flap.
Assessment included measurements of bone gain at the undercut defect and bone density labial to implants in each group from the cone-beam computed tomography
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 14
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in bone density buccal to the implant baseline and 4 months Bone density was evaluated by CBCT
Change in bone width gain at the undercut area baseline and 4 months Bone width gain was evaluated by CBCT
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Outpatient Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
🇪🇬Alexandria, Egypt
Outpatient Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University🇪🇬Alexandria, Egypt