Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01940367
NCT01940367
Unknown
Not Applicable

Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation vs. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Overactive Bladder: A Randomized Trial

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center3 sites in 1 country114 target enrollmentOctober 2013

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Overactive Bladder
Sponsor
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Enrollment
114
Locations
3
Primary Endpoint
Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation vs. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Overactive Bladder: A Randomized Trial
Last Updated
10 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether transcutaneous sacral nerve stimulation (TENS SNS) versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a more effective therapeutic option for subjects with idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) who have failed conventional therapy. Our primary hypothesis is that TENS therapy is a more effective treatment option due to ease of use and improved subject compliance with this form of therapy.

Detailed Description

To compare the long-term efficacy, subject compliance, and subject satisfaction of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) therapy versus transcutaneous electrical sacral nerve stimulation (TENS) for the treatment of subjects with idiopathic overactive bladder. Previous short-term studies suggest that these therapies have equal efficacy in improving OAB symptoms, but we hypothesize that long-term efficacy and success is actually higher in the TENS group due to ease of use, since subjects can self-administer this therapy. Secondary goals are to evaluate subject quality of life improvement scores, bladder diary scores (change in the frequency of urination), and changes in urodynamic studies while undergoing these therapies.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
October 2013
End Date
December 2017
Last Updated
10 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
Female

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Shannon Lamb

Physician

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age \>18 years
  • Predominant complaint urge urinary incontinence (3 or more episodes per week) OR overactive bladder (8 or more voids per day, and/or 2 or more voids per night)
  • Failed trial of conservative therapy (bladder training, fluid modification, diet modification, caffeine restriction, pelvic floor training)
  • Failed trial of anticholinergic either due to inability to take the medication, adverse reaction to medication, or no improvement on medication
  • Willing and mentally competent to participate in study
  • Willing to complete study questionnaires
  • No contraindications to undergoing PTNS or TENS therapy

Exclusion Criteria

  • Age \< 18 years
  • Presence of urinary fistula
  • Male. (Males will be excluded because of the different etiology of overactive bladder for males which is primarily caused by prostate problems for men versus the primarily idiopathic cause in women).
  • Recurrent or current urinary tract infection (5 or more infections in the last 12 months)
  • Bladder stones
  • Bladder cancer or suspected bladder cancer
  • Hematuria
  • Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant during the study (urine pregnancy test will be administered to those who are premenopausal and who have not had a hysterectomy)
  • Central or peripheral neurologic disorders such as Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, spina bifida, or other spinal cord lesion
  • Metal implants such as pacemaker, implantable defibrillator, or metal implants where PTNS or TENS device needs to be placed (sacrum or ankle/leg).

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation vs. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Overactive Bladder: A Randomized Trial

Time Frame: 2 years

The primary response variable is 'success' at 1 year, defined as a 50% or more reduction in the total number of incontinence episodes, or a 25% or more reduction in number of daily or nightly voids AND that the patient continues to use the therapy at one year. Therefore primary response is: 50% reduction in incontinence, OR 25% reduction in nightly voids AND continued use of therapy at one year.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation vs. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Overactive Bladder: A Randomized Trial(2 Years)

Study Sites (3)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials