A Study to Evaluate Risankizumab in Adults and Adolescents With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
- Conditions
- Dermatitis
- Interventions
- Biological: RisankizumabBiological: Placebo
- Registration Number
- NCT03706040
- Lead Sponsor
- AbbVie
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of risankizumab for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults and adolescents.
- Detailed Description
This study includes a screening period of up to 35 days, a 16-week double-blind treatment period (Period A), and a 36-week double-blind treatment period (Period B).
Participants who meet eligibility criteria will be randomized at Baseline in a 2:2:1 ratio to one of 3 treatment groups: (1) risankizumab 150 mg, (2) risankizumab 300 mg, or (3) matching placebo. Randomization will be stratified by Baseline disease severity (Validated Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis \[vIGA-AD\] score of moderate \[3\] versus severe \[4\]) and geographic region (Japan versus rest of world).
At Week 16, participants in the placebo group will be re-randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either risankizumab 150 mg or 300 mg for the remainder of the study. Participants originally randomized to the risankizumab 150 mg or 300 mg arms will stay on their previously-assigned treatment through the end of the study.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 172
- adults who are ≥ 18 years old and, where locally permissible and approved, adolescent subjects who are at least 12 years old
- a diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (AD) with onset of symptoms at least 2 years prior to Baseline and subject meets Hanifin and Rajka criteria
- moderate to severe AD at the Baseline Visit
- history of inadequate response to previous topical corticosteroid and/or topical calcineurin inhibitor treatments or a medical inability to receive these treatments
- prior exposure to any biologic immunomodulatory agent or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor
- concurrent treatment with systemic therapy for AD (biologic or non-biologic) or topical and/or phototherapy treatments
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Risankizumab 150 mg Risankizumab Participants randomized to receive risankizumab 150 mg for 16 weeks in Period A followed by risankizumab 150 mg for 36 weeks in Period B. Placebo Risankizumab Participants randomized to receive placebo for 16 weeks in Period A followed by either risankizumab 150 mg or risankizumab 300 mg for 36 weeks in Period B. Placebo Placebo Participants randomized to receive placebo for 16 weeks in Period A followed by either risankizumab 150 mg or risankizumab 300 mg for 36 weeks in Period B. Risankizumab 300 mg Risankizumab Participants randomized to receive risankizumab 300 mg for 16 weeks in Period A followed by risankizumab 300 mg for 36 weeks in Period B.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Participants Achieving At Least a 75% Reduction From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75) at Week 16 Baseline and Week 16 EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none \[0\], mild \[1\], moderate \[2\], or severe \[3\]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a SCORAD 50 Response at Week 28 and Week 52 Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst).
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a SCORAD 75 Response at Week 28 and Week 52 Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst).
A SCORAD 75 response is defined as at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in SCORAD score.Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a vIGA-AD Score of "0" or "1" With a Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 2 Points at Week 16 Baseline and Week 16 Validated Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) was used to assess the severity of AD based on lesion appearance on the following scale:
* 0 - Clear: No signs of AD;
* 1 - Almost clear: Barely perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification;
* 2 - Mild: Slight but definite erythema, induration/papulation and/or minimal lichenification. No oozing or crusting;
* 3 - Moderate: Clearly perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, possible oozing or crusting;
* 4 - Severe: Marked erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; possible oozing or crusting.Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points in Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 16 Baseline and Week 16 Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch).
Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 16 Baseline and Week 16 EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none \[0\], mild \[1\], moderate \[2\], or severe \[3\]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease; a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an EASI 90 Response at Week 16 Baseline, Week 16 EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none \[0\], mild \[1\], moderate \[2\], or severe \[3\]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
An EASI 90 response is defined as at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.Change From Baseline in Percentage of BSA Affected by Atopic Dermatitis at Weeks 28 and 52 Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 Body surface area (BSA) affected by atopic dermatitis was assessed by the physician and is expressed as a percentage of the total BSA. For purposes of the estimation, the total surface of the participant's palm plus five digits was assumed to be approximately equivalent to 1% BSA. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
LS means and standard errors were calculated from ANCOVA with Baseline, treatment and stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories) in the model.Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score of "0" or "1" at Week 16 Week 16 The CDLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on QoL. The CDLQI has been validated for use in individuals 4-16 years old. It consists of 10 questions assessing impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a patient's QoL over the prior week. The CDLQI items include symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, school, relationships, sleep, and treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all; 1 = only a little; 2 = quite a lot; and 3 = very much). Item scores (0 to 3) are added to provide a total score range of 0 to 30; higher scores indicate greater impairment of QoL. A score of 0 or 1 means that the disease has no effect at all.
In this study, the CDLQI was administered to participants who were \< 16 years old at Baseline.Change From Baseline in DLQI Score at Week 16 Baseline and Week 16 The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 28 and Week 52 Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 EASI is used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected and the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none \[0\], mild \[1\], moderate \[2\], or severe \[3\]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling), scratching, and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease; a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
LS means were calculated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with Baseline, treatment and vIGA-AD categories in the model.Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an EASI 75 Response at Week 28 and Week 52 Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none \[0\], mild \[1\], moderate \[2\], or severe \[3\]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an EASI 50 Response at Week 28 and Week 52 Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none \[0\], mild \[1\], moderate \[2\], or severe \[3\]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
An EASI 50 response is defined as at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a vIGA-AD Score of "0" or "1" With a Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 2 Points at Week 28 and Week 52 Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 Validated Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) was used to assess the severity of AD based on lesion appearance on the following scale:
* 0 - Clear: No signs of AD;
* 1 - Almost clear: Barely perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification;
* 2 - Mild: Slight but definite erythema, induration/papulation and/or minimal lichenification. No oozing or crusting;
* 3 - Moderate: Clearly perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, possible oozing or crusting;
* 4 - Severe: Marked erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; possible oozing or crusting.Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score of "0" or "1" at Week 16 Week 16 The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL. A score of 0 or 1 means that the disease has no effect at all.Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a CDLQI Score of "0" or "1" at Week 28 and Week 52 Weeks 28 and 52 The CDLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on QoL. The CDLQI has been validated for use in individuals 4-16 years old. It consists of 10 questions assessing impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a patient's QoL over the prior week. The CDLQI items include symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, school, relationships, sleep, and treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all; 1 = only a little; 2 = quite a lot; and 3 = very much). Item scores (0 to 3) are added to provide a total score range of 0 to 30; higher scores indicate greater impairment of QoL. A score of 0 or 1 means that the disease has no effect at all.
In this study, the CDLQI was administered to participants who were \< 16 years old at Baseline.Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an EASI 50 Response at Week 16 Baseline and Week 16 EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none \[0\], mild \[1\], moderate \[2\], or severe \[3\]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
EASI 50 response is defined as at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an EASI 90 Response at Week 28 and Week 52 Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none \[0\], mild \[1\], moderate \[2\], or severe \[3\]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
An EASI 90 response is defined as at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.Change From Baseline in Percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Atopic Dermatitis at Week 16 Baseline and Week 16 Body surface area (BSA) affected by atopic dermatitis was assessed by the physician and is expressed as a percentage of the total BSA. For purposes of the estimation, the total surface of the participant's palm plus five digits was assumed to be approximately equivalent to 1% BSA. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score (SCORAD 50) at Week 16 Baseline, Week 16 SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst).
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a SCORAD 75 Response at Week 16 Baseline and Week 16 SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst).
A SCORAD 75 response is defined as at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in SCORAD score.Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Reduction in DLQI of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline at Week 16 Among Those With a DLQI ≥ 4 at Baseline Baseline and Week 16 The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL.
A change in DLQI score of at least 4 points is considered the minimum clinically important difference (MCID).Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Reduction in DLQI of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline at Week 28 and Week 52 Among Those With a DLQI ≥ 4 at Baseline Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL.
A change in DLQI score of at least 4 points is considered the minimum clinically important difference (MCID).Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a SCORAD 90 Response at Week 16 Baseline and Week 16 SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst).
A SCORAD 90 response is defined as at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in SCORAD score.Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a SCORAD 90 Response at Week 28 and Week 52 Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst).
A SCORAD 90 response is defined as at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in SCORAD score.Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a DLQI Score of "0" or "1" at Week 28 and Week 52 Weeks 28 and 52 The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL. A score of 0 or 1 means that the disease has no effect at all.Change From Baseline in CDLQI Score at Week 28 and Week 52 Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 The CDLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on QoL. The CDLQI has been validated for use in individuals 4-16 years old. It consists of 10 questions assessing impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a patient's QoL over the prior week. The CDLQI items include symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, school, relationships, sleep, and treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all; 1 = only a little; 2 = quite a lot; and 3 = very much). Item scores (0 to 3) are added to provide a total score range of 0 to 30; higher scores indicate greater impairment of QoL. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
In this study, the CDLQI was administered to participants who were \< 16 years old at the Baseline visit.
LS means were calculated from ANCOVA with Baseline and treatment in the model.Change From Baseline in DLQI Score at Week 28 and Week 52 Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
LS means and standard errors were calculated from an ANCOVA model with Baseline, treatment and stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories) in the model.Change From Baseline in CDLQI Score at Week 16 Baseline and Week 16 The CDLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on QoL. The CDLQI has been validated for use in individuals 4-16 years old. It consists of 10 questions assessing impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a patient's QoL over the prior week. The CDLQI items include symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, school, relationships, sleep, and treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all; 1 = only a little; 2 = quite a lot; and 3 = very much). Item scores (0 to 3) are added to provide a total score range of 0 to 30; higher scores indicate greater impairment of QoL. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
In this study, the CDLQI was administered to participants who were \< 16 years old at the Baseline visit.Change From Baseline in Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale at Week 16 Baseline and Week 16 Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Change from Baseline was calculated from a rolling weekly average. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 28 and Week 52 Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch).
Change From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 28 and Week 52 Baseline and Weeks 28 and 52 Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Change from Baseline was calculated from a rolling weekly average. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
LS means and standard errors were calculated from an ANCOVA with Baseline, treatment and stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories) in the model.
Trial Locations
- Locations (65)
Beacon Dermatology Inc /ID# 213003
🇨🇦Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Fremantle Dermatology /ID# 204784
🇦🇺Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
Center for Dermatology Clinical Research /ID# 204950
🇺🇸Fremont, California, United States
Cognitive Clinical Trials /ID# 208895
🇺🇸Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Colorado Center for Dermatology, PLLC /ID# 216260
🇺🇸Centennial, Colorado, United States
Park Avenue Dermatology, PA /ID# 203378
🇺🇸Orange Park, Florida, United States
University Dermatology and Vein Clinic, LLC /ID# 210702
🇺🇸Darien, Illinois, United States
The Indiana Clinical Trials Center /ID# 211618
🇺🇸Plainfield, Indiana, United States
Duplicate_Great Lakes Research, Inc. /ID# 206447
🇺🇸Bay City, Michigan, United States
DermAssociates /ID# 206189
🇺🇸Rockville, Maryland, United States
Oakland Hills Dermatology /ID# 217453
🇺🇸Auburn Hills, Michigan, United States
Darst Dermatology /ID# 215100
🇺🇸Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Psoriasis Treatment Center of Central New Jersey /ID# 203203
🇺🇸East Windsor, New Jersey, United States
Dermatologists of Southwest Ohio, Inc /ID# 215104
🇺🇸Mason, Ohio, United States
Dermatologic SurgiCenter /ID# 208972
🇺🇸Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania, United States
Dermdox Dermatology Centers, PC /ID# 212259
🇺🇸Hazleton, Pennsylvania, United States
Derm Assoc of Plymouth Meeting /ID# 208925
🇺🇸Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, United States
RI SkinDoc /ID# 203417
🇺🇸Johnston, Rhode Island, United States
Omega Medical Research /ID# 216022
🇺🇸Warwick, Rhode Island, United States
Health Concepts /ID# 203205
🇺🇸Rapid City, South Dakota, United States
Virginia Dermatology & Skin Cancer Center /ID# 210154
🇺🇸Norfolk, Virginia, United States
The Vancouver Clinic, INC. PS /ID# 202930
🇺🇸Vancouver, Washington, United States
Woden Dermatology /ID# 204778
🇦🇺Phillip, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
St George Hospital /ID# 204780
🇦🇺Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
Veracity Clinical Research /ID# 204786
🇦🇺Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
Skin Health Institute Inc /ID# 204779
🇦🇺Carlton, Victoria, Australia
North Eastern Health Specialists /ID# 204785
🇦🇺Hectorville, South Australia, Australia
Kirk Barber Research, CA /ID# 201046
🇨🇦Calgary, Alberta, Canada
University of Alberta Hospital - Division of Hematology /ID# 213008
🇨🇦Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Dr. Wei Jing Loo Medicine Prof /ID# 208849
🇨🇦London, Ontario, Canada
Dre Angelique Gagne-Henley M.D. inc. /ID# 208189
🇨🇦Saint-Jerome, Quebec, Canada
Medicor Research Inc /ID# 211274
🇨🇦Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
Kurume University Hospital /ID# 203139
🇯🇵Kurume-shi, Fukuoka, Japan
Japan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety Chubu Rosai Hospital /ID# 213667
🇯🇵Nagoya-shi, Aichi, Japan
Nippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital /ID# 213961
🇯🇵Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan
Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital /ID# 214140
🇯🇵Nagaoka-shi, Niigata, Japan
University of the Ryukyus Hospital /ID# 203974
🇯🇵Nakagami-gun, Okinawa, Japan
Tokyo Medical University Hospital /ID# 203647
🇯🇵Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Osaka City University Hospital /ID# 203410
🇯🇵Osaka-shi, Osaka, Japan
Hamamatsu University Hospital /ID# 203270
🇯🇵Hamamatsu-shi, Shizuoka, Japan
Tokyo Medical University Hospital /ID# 204101
🇯🇵Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Teikyo University Hospital /ID# 202884
🇯🇵Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Clinical Research Puerto Rico /ID# 213118
🇵🇷San Juan, Puerto Rico
Dr. Samuel Sanchez PSC /ID# 213117
🇵🇷Caguas, Puerto Rico
Cruz-Santana, Carolina, PR /ID# 213229
🇵🇷Carolina, Puerto Rico
UAB Department of Dermatology /ID# 211561
🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Cosmetic Dermatology of Orange County /ID# 205801
🇺🇸Anaheim, California, United States
Integrative Skin Science and Research /ID# 212486
🇺🇸Sacramento, California, United States
Cosmetic Laser Dermatology /ID# 210560
🇺🇸San Diego, California, United States
Therapeutics Clinical Research /ID# 203422
🇺🇸San Diego, California, United States
MetroDerm ACC Research /ID# 205958
🇺🇸Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Skin Care Physicians of Georgia /ID# 213188
🇺🇸Macon, Georgia, United States
Tulane University /ID# 203214
🇺🇸New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Grekin Skin Institute /ID# 210485
🇺🇸Warren, Michigan, United States
Skin Cancer and Dermatology Institute (SCDI) /ID# 213041
🇺🇸Reno, Nevada, United States
Unity Clinical Research /ID# 217461
🇺🇸Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Oregon Derm & Res. Ctr /ID# 202880
🇺🇸Portland, Oregon, United States
University of Pittsburgh MC /ID# 203296
🇺🇸Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Rivergate Dermatology & Skin Care Center /ID# 203372
🇺🇸Goodlettsville, Tennessee, United States
Arlington Research Center, Inc /ID# 215899
🇺🇸Arlington, Texas, United States
Tekton Research, Inc. /ID# 211558
🇺🇸Austin, Texas, United States
Center for Clinical Studies - Houston (Binz) /ID# 203383
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States
Acclaim Dermatology /ID# 213026
🇺🇸Sugar Land, Texas, United States
Dominion Medical Associates /ID# 212986
🇺🇸Richmond, Virginia, United States
Lynderm Research Inc. /ID# 201050
🇨🇦Markham, Ontario, Canada