MedPath

Changes of Soft Tissue Grafting: A Randomized Study

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Gingival Recession
Interventions
Procedure: Split Mouth Design
Registration Number
NCT05633511
Lead Sponsor
Tufts University
Brief Summary

To correct gum recession, patient's own tissue from the roof of the mouth is harvested and placed where there is root exposed. This is considered gold standard of treatment. Sometimes patient don't want to have second surgical site in their mouth and at the same time do not want to use alternative tissue from human or animal donor. Using patients' blood and preparing it as a membrane is the next best thing to correct gum recession.

Detailed Description

Patients that are interested in having corrective surgery for recession due to esthetic concerns or sensitivity will be enrolled in the study. The treatment site will randomly receive the procedure assignment. Intraoral scanner will be utilized to establish pre-op volume and will be repeated at each follow up visit. Total of 12 visits and 5 year duration is anticipated for the study.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Adults 18yrs or older
  2. Need of MG-tx for 2 or more sites for root coverage RT I and II (Cairo classification)
  3. Class A +/-
  4. No class V restoration present
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Patients who do not consent to recommended therapy
  2. Patients who smoke
  3. Patients who will not be able to comply with follow up protocols
  4. Those who self report that they are pregnant.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
All ParticipantsSplit Mouth DesignParticipants will receive the CTG procedure on one side and the PRF procedure on the other. Both are standard of care soft tissue grafting methods and a split mouth design is standard of care.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Compare autologous PRF & Autogenous CTG5 years

Primary objective of this study is to compare in a split-mouth study the effectiveness of CTG vs. PRF in soft tissue augmentation and volume stability of each treatment modality in correcting the Cairo Class I, II defects in Periodontally affected patients

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Tufts University School of Dental Medicine

🇺🇸

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath