Comparison of Direct and Indirect Images of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes in Adult Airway Management
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Anesthesia
- Sponsor
- Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital
- Enrollment
- 70
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Comparison of Direct and Indirect Images of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes in Adult Airway Management
- Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to answer the question of whether direct laryngoscopy can be performed with videolaryngoscopes. How do the videos of the laryngoscopes provide images directly in laryngoscopy? Primary objective: To compare the images of Hugemed and Mcgrath videolarinygoscope in direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy secondary objective: to compare the effects on haemodynamic response Participants :people who are not expected to have difficult intubation
Detailed Description
Direct and indirect images of hugemed and McGrath videolaryngoscope during intubation, haemodynamic responses, procedure time will be compared
Investigators
Özlem Sezen
Associate Professor
Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •To be between 18 -65 years old Mallampati score I-II Cormack-Lehane score I-II ASA physical status I-II who required endotracheal intubation for elective surgery
- •Exclusion criteria Pregnancy Mallampati score III-IV Cormack-Lehane score III-IV ASA physical score III-IV sternomental distance \< 12.5 cm mandibular-hyoid distance \< 6 cm
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Comparison of Direct and Indirect Images of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes in Adult Airway Management
Time Frame: 3 months
The principal objective of this study was to undertake a comparative analysis of the images produced by two distinct VLs during direct and indirect laryngoscopy