Non Ablative Fractional Laser Treatment of Burn Scars
- Conditions
- Burn Scars
- Interventions
- Radiation: non-ablative fractional laserOther: control
- Registration Number
- NCT02014298
- Lead Sponsor
- Bispebjerg Hospital
- Brief Summary
BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence appears for non-ablative fractional laser (NAFL) to remodel mature burn scars.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate long-term clinical and histological appearance of mature burn scars after NAFL-treatment.
HYPOTHESIS: That NAFL can modulate mature burn scars with subsequently improved cosmetic and functional appearance.
METHODS: Study patients with burn scars at trunk or extremities. Side-by-side test areas are randomized to three monthly 1,540 nm NAFL-treatments or control, followed by blinded evaluations at 1, 3, and 6 months using mPOSAS (modified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale; 1 = normal skin, 10 = worst imaginable scar).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- legally competent adults aged 18-60 years
- Fitzpatrick skin type I-III
- burn scar 1 year or older
- total scar area allowing selection of two similar side-by-side test areas of minimum 1.5 × 3 cm for study purpose
- pregnancy or lactation
- suntan
- wounds or infections in study area
- tendency to form hypertrophic scars or keloids
- oral retinoids, anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive drugs within the last six months
- current anticoagulants
- previous treatments in test area with laser, Intense Pulsed Light, dermabrasion, chemical peel or filler.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Control non-ablative fractional laser One area assessed as a control area, compared to the laser-treated area Non-ablative Laser treatment control 3 Non-ablative fractional laser treatments of one area
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in overall Scar-appearance 1,3 and 6 months follow-up Primary endpoint is change in overall scar-appearance assessed by a slightly modified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (evaluation of study area omitted since this is fixed as part of study procedure). Scale: 1= normal skin; 10= worst imaginable scar.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method specific clinical and histological scar appearance 1, 3, and 6 months follow-up Additional assessments include:
* evaluation of vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability (evaluated on modified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale)
* histological changes (Small safety issue from taking a 4 mm cutaneous punch biopsy)
* patient satisfaction
* adverse events (pain during treatment, immediate treatment reaction, 24h treatment reaction, evaluation of side effects at 6 months follow-up)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen
🇩🇰Copenhagen NV, Copenhagen, Denmark