KingVision Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy - Equivalence Trial
- Conditions
- Tracheal Intubation
- Interventions
- Device: Ambu KingVision Video Laryngoscope aBladeDevice: Miller Direct Laryngoscopy
- Registration Number
- NCT02590237
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the Ambu KingVision videolaryngoscope performs as well as direct laryngoscopy for intubating small children and infants.
- Detailed Description
The goal of this prospective randomized study is to compare the Ambu KingVision Video Laryngoscope and direct laryngoscopy using the Miller Blade Laryngoscope.
The primary outcome of the study will be time to successful intubation. Other outcomes of clinical relevance such as first attempt success rates of intubation, grade of laryngeal view, percentage of glottic opening, number of insertion attempts, hemodynamic responses, and complications will also be assessed.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 200
- Patients at Lurie Children's Hospital undergoing surgery/procedure where intubation is indicated
- American Society of Anesthesiology Class I-III patients
- Children with an expected difficult airway
- A bleeding or blood clotting disorder
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description KingVision Video Laryngoscope Ambu KingVision Video Laryngoscope aBlade The trachea will be intubated using the Ambu KingVision Video Laryngoscope size 1 pediatric blade. Direct Laryngoscopy Miller Direct Laryngoscopy The trachea will be intubated via direct laryngoscopy using a traditional straight blade (Miller) laryngoscope.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time to Intubation Assessed intraoperatively at time of intubation Three timepoints will be recorded, beginning with insertion of the device past the lips into the mouth. These will include time to optimal glottic view, time to removal of device from mouth, and time to first CO2 capnography upstroke. The primary outcome measure will be total time to intubation, as the sum of all three timepoints.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method First Attempt Success Rate of Tracheal Intubation Assessed intraoperatively at time of intubation An attempt at tracheal intubation will be defined as entry of the device into the patient's mouth without the need to remove the device once entered and securing the airway.
Grades of Laryngeal View Assessed intraoperatively at time of intubation Cormack Lehane (1-4) and percentage of glottic opening (POGO) (%) will be recorded after insertion of the laryngoscope
Intubation Adjustments & Ease of Use Assessed intraoperatively following intubation Airway manipulations utilized and ease of use (Likert 1-5) will be assessed by the user following the intubation.
Hemodynamic Parameters - Heart Rate Assessed intraoperatively at time of and following intubation Heart rate (beats per minute) will be assessed prior to intubation and at 1 minute intervals, for 5 minutes, following intubation.
Hemodynamic Parameters - Blood Pressure Assessed intraoperatively at time of and following intubation Blood pressure (mmHg) will be assessed prior to intubation and at 1 minute intervals, for 5 minutes, following intubation.
Intraoperative Complications Assessed intraoperatively Airway/device related complications including, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, oxygen desaturation, will be assessed at intubation, during the surgery, and after extubation while under the anesthesiologists care.
Postoperative Complications Assessed postoperatively while admitted to the phase 1 recovery unit, approximately 30-60 minutes after surgery Airway/device related complications including sore throat, hoarseness, persistent coughing, stridor, and others will be assessed in the post anesthesia care unit.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States