King Vision® and GlideScope® in Difficult Airways
- Conditions
- Airway Management
- Interventions
- Device: Video laryngoscopes
- Registration Number
- NCT03685968
- Brief Summary
There are several advantages of video laryngoscopy; especially their ability to provide superior glottis visualization, as compared to traditional laryngoscopy.1-3 The purpose of this three arm study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the King Vision® Video Intubation Systems (AMBU-King Systems, Denmark) to the Cobalt GlideScope® (Verathon Medical Inc., USA) in patients with anticipated difficult airways.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 225
- Over 18 years of age
- Mallampati III-IV
- Neck circumference > 43cm
- Reduced mouth opening (< 4cm) or 3 Finger breath's (patient's own)
- Thyromental distance < 6cm
- Mallampati I-II
- Neck circumference < 43cm
- Documented 'easy' intubation
- Previous history of failed intubation and failed bag-mask ventilation
- Under 18 years of age
- ASA IV
- Known unstable cervical spine injury
- Presentation for an emergency surgical procedure
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description King Vision Non-Channeled (Standard) VL Video laryngoscopes - Glidescope AVL Video laryngoscopes - King Vision Channeled VL Video laryngoscopes -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Overall Successful Tracheal Intubation for All 3 Video Laryngoscopes - GSAVL, KVChVL and KVNChVL During laryngoscopy and endotracheal tube placement The overall intubation success rates for all 3 video laryngoscopes - GSAVL, KVChVL and KVNChVL
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method First-attempt Successful Intubation for All 3 Video Laryngoscopes - GSAVL, KVChVL and KVNChVL During laryngoscopy and endotracheal tube placement The overall first-attempt success rates for all 3 video laryngoscopes - GSAVL, KVChVL and KVNChVL