Correlation of glaucomatous disc appearance detection from fundus images acquired from Traditional fundus camera versus Confocal scanner fundus camera
Recruiting
- Conditions
- Correlation of glaucomatous disc appearance detection from fundus images acquired from Traditional fundus camera versus Confocal scanner fundus cameraglaucoma suspect, glaucomatous disc appearance detection, fundus images, Confocal scanner fundus camera
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
Inclusion Criteria
Patients who diagnose diabetes and receive screening of retinal diabetes by traditional fundus camera and Confocal scanner fundus camera.
the reason for choosing patients with diabetes because,
1. Want to use research results to artificial intelligence development that can screen glaucoma along with the retinal diabetes screening when patients come to the annual retinal diabetes screening.
2. A sample group that has a fundus photo with both fundus camera techniques.
Exclusion Criteria
1) Unclear the quality of the image detail is not enough to analysis. In a fundus photo from one or both cameras.
2) Optic nerve photos have other abnormalities. That is not the characteristics of glaucoma such as Optic disc atrophy, Optic disc edema, Optic disc anomalies, etc.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Compare concordance in the diagnosis of glaucoma suspect in NIDEK and EIDON by fundus photo first visit Agreement test by Cohen's kappa coefficient more than 0.75
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Compare characteristics glaucoma optic nerve abnormalities from EIDON and NIDEK first visit Enlarged vertical cup to disc ratio more than 0.7, Neuroretinal rim notching, Rim area comparison (inferior less than superior), Retinal nerve fiber layer defect, Disc haemorrhage,Prevalence of glaucoma suspect in diabetic screening by fundus photo first visit Number of glaucoma suspect detection from fundus photo