Outcomes Comparison of Robotic, Retropubic, and Perineal Prostatectomy
Completed
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Registration Number
- NCT00442000
- Lead Sponsor
- William Beaumont Hospitals
- Brief Summary
Compare peri-operative and postoperative outcomes of the three different surgical approaches to prostatectomy
- Detailed Description
Existing data collected from Prostatectomy Database study and Urology Database study will be analyzed. Compare peri-operative and postoperative outcomes of the three different surgical approaches to prostatectomy
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 700
Inclusion Criteria
- 18 years of age
- Radical Prostatectomy at William Beaumont Hospital
Exclusion Criteria
- Dementia
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What are the molecular mechanisms underlying robotic prostatectomy's impact on androgen receptor signaling in prostate cancer patients?
How does the robotic approach compare to retropubic and perineal methods in terms of postoperative PSA recurrence rates for localized prostate cancer?
Which biomarkers correlate with better functional recovery outcomes after different prostatectomy approaches in clinical studies?
What are the long-term adverse event profiles of robotic, retropubic, and perineal prostatectomy techniques in the Prostatectomy Database study?
How do the outcomes of NCT00442000 compare to contemporary trials using focal therapies for low-risk prostate cancer management?
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
William Beaumont Hospital
🇺🇸Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
William Beaumont Hospital🇺🇸Royal Oak, Michigan, United States