NL-OMON33887招募中不适用
Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy - TIME-trial
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 至 99（—）
入选标准
- •1. Histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma of the intrathoracic esophagus.
- •2. Surgical resectable (T1-3, N0-1, M0).
- •3. Age * 18 and * 75 years.
- •4. European Clinical Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0,1 or 2.
- •5. Written, informed consent.
排除标准
- •1. Cervical and gastro-esophageal junction carcinoma.
- •2. Prior thoracic surgery.
- •3. No informed consent
研究者
相似试验
已完成
不适用
Traditional invasive versus minimally invasive esophagectomy.oesophagectomy, minimally invasive, open, cancerNL-OMON20420VU university medical center160
已完成
1 期
Minivally Invasive versus OPen esophagectomy - comparision of short- and long-term outcomeC15.5Lower third of oesophagusDRKS00011676niversitätsklinikum Heidelberg80
招募中
不适用
Minimally invasive versus conventional surgical aortic valve replacement: retrospective multicentre-studyI35.0Aortic (valve) stenosisDRKS00025211Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus5,000
已完成
不适用
Microsurgical versus minimal invasive approach (Metrix instrument), for lumbar disc herniation surgery: a randomized controlled trial on clinical outcome.M51.1Lumbar and other intervertebral disc disorders with radiculopathyDRKS00000092Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie Direktor Prof. Dr. J. Schramm226
招募中
不适用
MInimal inVasive versus open AbdominoThoracic EsophagectomyC15.5Lower third of oesophagusDRKS00016773Chirurgische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg40