NL-OMON20420已完成不适用
Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-centered, randomized trial.
VU university medical center0 个研究点目标入组 160 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 160
研究概览
简要总结
Biere SSAY, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Chirurgica. 2009; 64: 121-133.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •1. Histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma of the intrathoracic oesophagus and Siewert I junction tumors which are surgically resectable (T1-3, N0-1, M0);
- •2. Treatment with neo-adjuvant therapy;
排除标准
- •1. Carcinoma of the cervical oesophagus;
- •2. Prior thoracic surgery;
研究者
相似试验
招募中
不适用
Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomyOesophageal cancer100179901001799110017998NL-OMON33887Vrije Universiteit Medisch Centrum
已完成
1 期
Minivally Invasive versus OPen esophagectomy - comparision of short- and long-term outcomeC15.5Lower third of oesophagusDRKS00011676niversitätsklinikum Heidelberg80
尚未招募
不适用
Assessment of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Esophageal CancerEsophageal CancerNCT05662644Sohag University30
Unknown
不适用
Traditional Three-incision Esophagectomy Versus Minimally Invasive Thorascopic and Laparoscopic EsophagectomyEsophageal CancerNCT02448966Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences1,000
已完成
2 期
Esophagectomy in Treating Patients With High-Grade Dysplasia of the Esophagus or Stage I, Stage II, or Stage III Esophageal CancerEsophageal CancerNCT00063986Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group110