Comparison of Regional Anaesthesia Methods for Femoral Neck Fracture Surgery
- Conditions
- Femoral Neck FracturesRegional Anesthesia
- Registration Number
- NCT06224439
- Lead Sponsor
- Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Education and Research Hospital
- Brief Summary
Femoral fracture surgery is frequently performed especially in geriatric population. Compared to general anaesthesia, regional anaesthesia is preferred to general anaesthesia in the geriatric patient population due to lower postoperative pulmonary complications, reduced frequency of delirium and analgesic requirement, intraoperative haemodynamic stability, early postoperative mobilisation and early discharge.
Central and peripheral regional anaesthesia methods have advantages and disadvantages. This situation causes difficulties in the choice of anaesthesia method. Central regional anaesthesia techniques have more haemodynamic effects and higher frequency of complications compared to peripheral methods. The disadvantages of peripheral methods are that they require ultrasound, block needle, nerve stimulator and require knowledgeable and skilled practitioners.
Since there is no study showing the comparison of peripheral nerve blocks and hypobaric spinal anaesthesia with objective nociception values and there are difficulties in the choice of anaesthesia method in this regard, a study was deemed necessary.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 90
- >18 years and <90 years
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score between I and IV
- Patients who will undergo femoral neck fracture surgery
- Previous local anesthetic allergy
- Those with bleeding diathesis disorder
- Having a mental disorder
- Those who are allergic to the drugs used
- Patients who did not consent to participate in the study
- Presence of infection in the block area
- Body mass index >30
- Preoperative or intraoperative general anesthesia
- Patients for whom consent cannot be obtained
- Pregnant patients
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method intraoperative haemodynamic parameters intraoperative 2 hours non-invasive systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure mean arterial pressure (mm/hg)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Entropy intraoperative 2 hours Entropy monitoring involves using electroencephalography-a strip of electrodes applied to the forehead-to assess the depth of general anesthesia in surgical patients. The goal of entropy monitoring is to ensure that patients are given appropriate levels of anesthesia so that recovery is faster. Entropy monitoring provides quantitative measurement of depth of anaesthesia. The Response Entropy scale ranges from 0 (no brain activity) to 100 (fully awake) and the State Entropy scale ranges from 0 (no brain activity) to 91 (fully awake). The clinically relevant target range for entropy values is 40-60.
SPI intraoperative 2 hours The surgical pleth index (SPI) is a dimensionless score which is based on the photoplethysmographic analysis of the pulse wave and the heart beat interval. SPI scores monitored during surgery may reflect a patient's autonomic response to certain nociceptive stimuli. The values of the SPI range from 0 to 100. During general anaesthesia, maintaining a value between 20 and 50 is generally recommended
sedation and analgesic intraoperative 2 hours Intraoperative sedation and analgesic need (Whether there was a need or not how much is given in total mg or mcg)
Intraoperative bleeding intraoperative 2 hours
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital
🇹🇷Bursa, Turkey
Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital🇹🇷Bursa, Turkey