Orotracheal Intubation in Newborns: Videolaryngoscopy Vs Direct Laryngoscopy
Not Applicable
Recruiting
- Conditions
- The Time Taken for Successful Tracheal Intubation in Each Technique
- Registration Number
- NCT06655168
- Lead Sponsor
- Tunis University
- Brief Summary
The children were randomized into two groups to receive orotracheal intubation after anesthetic induction with neuromuscular blockade, either by direct laryngoscopy (DL, DL group) or by C-MAC video laryngoscopy (VL group)
- Detailed Description
prospective randomized study including newborns , requiring orotracheal intubation for surgery or mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. The children were randomized into two groups to receive orotracheal intubation after anesthetic induction with neuromuscular blockade, either by direct laryngoscopy (DL, DL group) or by C-MAC video laryngoscopy (VL group).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 115
Inclusion Criteria
- newborns requiring orotracheal intubation for surgery or mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit
Exclusion Criteria
- age> 01 month
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method time taken for successful tracheal intubation during intubation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method the need for additional device during intubation the number of attempts during intubation Complications during intubation during intubation complications such as desaturation and selective intubation.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Bechir Hamza hospital
🇹🇳Tunis, Tunisia