Comparison study between etomidate and propofol during screening colonoscopy

Not Applicable

Recruiting

• Conditions: Not Applicable

• Registration Number: KCT0002612
• Lead Sponsor: Korea University Anam Hospital

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Last Update Posted: 11 March 2019

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 272

Inclusion Criteria

All patients between the ages of more than 20 years old from American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA ?to ? )were scheduled to undergo endoscopy including colonoscopy, polypectomy and endoscopic submucosal dissection were included in this study.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients were excluded if they had known or suspected (1) a history of adverse events with prior sedation; (2) known hypersensitivity to egg products, soy beans, etomidate, and propofol (3) known adrenocortical insufficiency, chronic corticoid therapy, or porphyria; (4) pregnant or breastfeeding; (5) desire to undergo endoscopy without sedation; (6) inability to provide informed consent. If there was hemodynamic instability (systolic pressure < 90 mmHg or oxygen saturation (Sp02) was 90% in room air or <95% with 2L/min oxygen) at baseline measurement before procedure, the patient was withdrawn from the study

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional Study
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Cardiopulmonary adverse event

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Risky adverse event