Clinical Evaluation of Interstitial Laser Thermal Therapy Under Continuous MRI Monitoring as a Minimally Invasive Treatment of Patients With Medically Unbalanced Partial Epilepsy
- Conditions
- Focal EpilepsyEpilepsyEpilepsies, FocalDrug-resistant Focal EpilepsyDrug Resistant
- Interventions
- Procedure: Laser technology for intracerebral thermocoagulation
- Registration Number
- NCT05198882
- Lead Sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Brief Summary
Laser Induced Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) is a "minimally invasive" procedure that uses the heat generated by a laser light (65°) to destroy brain lesions by coagulation leading to lesion necrosis under real-time MRI monitoring. The laser optical fiber is implanted into the lesion using stereotaxy. This technique, which can be performed under local anesthesia and on an outpatient basis, proved its efficacy and safety in the treatment of brain metastases for the first time in the world in 2006 (A. Carpentier et al, 2008, 2011). Since then, more than 5,000 patients have been treated in the USA, including for epileptogenic lesions (FDA device and CE cleared). Our goal is to evaluate LITT on lesions with drug-resistant epilepsy for which surgical resection is impossible. No therapeutic trial evaluating LITT in this indication has been performed to date. It is therefore necessary to study its feasibility and tolerance.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 13
- Age ≥18 years and < 80 years
- Patient with a medically unbalanced partial epilepsy
- Patient with a lesional image(s) in morphological MRI responsible for epilepsy based on clinical and electrophysiological assessment, +/- PET +/- SPECT +/- MEG +/- sEEG
- Patients for whom scheduled neurosurgical treatment with craniotomy appears difficult: Deep lesions, eloquent region lesions, patient reluctance to perform surgery.
- Endorsement of the Multidisciplinary Meeting of Neuro-epileptology
- Patient affiliated with a social security scheme
- Patient who has signed prior, free and informed consent
- Pharmacosensitive epilepsy
- Patient with poor adherence to medication, or with psychological disorders
- Patients under legal protection
- Patient with a contraindication to MRI (metal shards, known allergy to gadolinium, etc.)
- Anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy underway, cannot be stopped.
- Severe and unbalanced psychiatric disorders
- Pregnant women. Women of childbearing age should use oral contraception throughout the study.
- Allergy to local anaesthetics / general anaesthesia
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description LITT technology Laser technology for intracerebral thermocoagulation Laser-induced thermocoagulation of intracerebral lesions responsible for drug-resistant epilepsy.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Frequency of post-surgical complication of grade greater or equal to 2 according to Mathon and al classification Day 30 post-operative To assess the safety and feasibility of laser-induced thermocoagulation of intracerebral lesions responsible for drug-resistant epilepsy.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Seizure freedom evaluated with ILAE (International League Against Epilepsy) classification Post surgery : Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Evaluate the clinical epileptic efficacy of treatment based by the ILAE and Engel classifications.
Number of seizure per patient Post surgery : Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Evaluate the frequency of seizure
Number of patient at least one modification of anti-epileptic treatment Post surgery : Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Evaluation of clinical efficacy of treatment
Mean change of quantification of the number of interictal peaks over 30 minutes evaluated at surface EEG compared to the pre surgery surface EEG Post surgery : Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Electrophysiological epileptic efficacy
Mean change neuropsychological scores Post surgery : Month 12 Evaluate the effect on cognition by a postoperative neuropsychological evaluation, compared with the pre-treatment neuropsychological evaluation.The neuro-psychological test will be selected according to the location of the lesion/focus
Incidence of adverse events Day of surgery, Day 2, Day 7, Day 30 post-operative Evaluate the clinical tolerance of the procedure.
Seizure freedom evaluated with Engel classification Post surgery : Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Evaluate the clinical epileptic efficacy of treatment based by the ILAE and Engel classifications.
Number of patient with at least one seizure with complex partial seizure Post surgery : Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 Evaluate the intensity of seizure after treatment.
Mean change in Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-31) scores Post surgery : Month 6, Month 12 Evaluate the effect on quality of life by comparing the preoperative assessment with the postoperative assessments.
Mean consumption of anti-epileptic drugs and epilepsy-related care Post surgery : Month 12 To assess the medico-economic impact of the treatment
Mean of major and minor axis measurements evaluated by measuring post-treatment morphological MRI images corresponding to induced necrosis in T1 gadolinium SPGR MRI Month 1, Month 3, Month 12 Evaluate the radiological epileptic efficacy of treatment
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière
🇫🇷Paris, France