Comparison of the FemoSeal® Arterial Closure Device to Manual Compression After Coronary Angiography
- Conditions
- Coronary Angiography Via Femoral Artery Access
- Interventions
- Device: FemoSeal®Other: Manual compression
- Registration Number
- NCT01001663
- Lead Sponsor
- Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
- Brief Summary
Is the FemoSeal® closure device safer and more comfortable than manual compression for femoral artery access closure after coronary angiography?
- Detailed Description
Access site complication after coronary angiography is still a challenge in everyday practice. The FemoSeal® closure device has proven very safe as shown in the swedish SCAAR registry. This study is aimed to investigate, in a randomized design, if the FemoSeal® has an advantage in safety and efficacy over manual compression.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1005
- The patient must be at least 18 years old
- Patients undergoing femoral access coronary angiography
- Patient must be competent for providing informed, written consent
- Only 6F sheath
- Percutaneous coronary intervention
- Intra coronary measurements (FFR, IVUS, OCT, NIR)
- Groin hematoma before closure
- Pseudoaneurysm or AV fistula
- Significant stenosis of ilial or femoral artery
- Prior peripheral artery surgery
- INR > 3,0
- Platelet count < 120 million per millilitre blood
- Coagulopathy (bleeding disorder)
- Thrombolysis in the last 24h
- Planned heparin infusion after the procedure
- Pregnancy
- Uncontrolled hypertension > 200 mmHg / 110 mmHg
- Femoral access device closure in the last 30 days
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description FemoSeal® FemoSeal® Closure device for femoral artery access closure Manual compression Manual compression Conventional manual compression
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Rate of ipsilateral palpable groin hematomas with largest diameter exceeding 5 cm. 20 minutes, 1 hour and at discharge, pooled
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Need for repeated manual compression after end of the closure procedure 14 days Pain and discomfort measured on a numerical pain rating scale (0-10) 14 days Vasovagal reaction (clinical signs AND Systolic BP drop of more than 30 mmHg AND/OR pulse drop more than 30 b/min. AND reversible immediately after treatment by atropin, fluids) 20 minutes The patient seeking medical assistance for all-cause closure site related symptoms after discharge. 14 days Rate of ipsilateral palpable groin hematomas with largest diameter exceeding 5 cm. Patient self-measurements. 14 days Composite of: major vascular complications necessitating surgical repair, A-V fistulation, pseudoaneurysm needing treatment, major bleeding needing transfusion and infection needing antibiotics . 14 days Time to hemostasis, from sheath removal to hemostasis is achieved 14 days Time from end of closure procedure to ambulation. 1h bedrest recommended. 14 days Device deployment failure 20 minutes Time to cessation of continuous minor oozing measured from the end of the closure procedure 14 days
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
🇩🇰Aarhus N, Denmark