Longitudinal Study of Different Surgical Approaches in Chinese Patients of Cervical Cancer
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
- Sponsor
- Lei Li
- Enrollment
- 3000
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Progression-free survival
- Last Updated
- 7 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This multi-center longitudinal study aims to compare the survival outcomes (including overall survival, progression-free survival and disease-free survival between uterine cervical patients receiving different surgical routes (vaginal, laparotomy and laparoscopy), which is the primary study objective. All clinical and pathological data would be retracted from case reviews, and all survival data would be reached by clinic, telephone and mail follow-up. This study also would analyze the impact on survival outcomes of other factors, including nerve-sparing techniques, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant radiotherapy and infection of human papillomavirus. The predictive effects of different following protocol and imaging plans will be also compared. Last, the influences of surgical routes on the fertility outcomes (pregnancy and its complications) and the ovarian reserve are important secondary study objectives.
Investigators
Lei Li
Professor
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Pathological confirmed as uterine cervical cancer
- •Having definite clinical information
- •Having received radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy
Exclusion Criteria
- •Not satisfying any of the inclusion criteria
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Progression-free survival
Time Frame: Five years
Length of time during and after the treatment of cervical cancer, that a patient lives with the disease but it does not get worse
Secondary Outcomes
- Overall survival(Five years)
- Disease-free survival(Five years)