MedPath

Comparison of Different Irrigation Activation Techniques on Postoperative Pain After Endodontic Treatment

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Postoperative Pain
Interventions
Procedure: Traditional Irrigation
Device: Xp-endo Finisher (XPF)
Device: Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation
Device: EndoActivator
Registration Number
NCT04262245
Lead Sponsor
Bulent Ecevit University
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of different irrigation activation methods on postoperative pain using visual analog scale (VAS) using Xp-endo Finisher, EndoActivator and Passive ultrasonic irrigation activation techniques with traditional irrigation method.

In this study, Traditional Irrigation (GI), Xp-endo Finisher (XPF), Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI), EndoActivator (EA) techniques will be used for irrigation activation. Twenty-five maxillary or mandibular single root and canal-shaped nonvital teeth will used in each group. Root canals will be prepared with TF-Adaptive system. Four different activation techniques will be applied during final irrigation. The canal treatments will be completed in one stage and postoperative pain analysis will be taken with VAS (Visual Analog Scale) scale after 12-24-48 hours. Statistical analysis will be performed with Mann Whitney-U test.

Detailed Description

Vaious irrigation activation techniques have been used endodontic practice. These techniques are used to improve the activity of solutions. The selected techniques in this study are accepted as efficient methods for activation. However, postoperative pan is an important issue for clinicians. Thus, Traditional Irrigation (GI), Xp-endo Finisher (XPF), Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI), EndoActivator (EA) techniques will be used for irrigation activation. All techniques remove hard and soft tissue remnants successfully. The clinician expect to eliminate the postoperative pain. Therefore, a possible increase in pain due to activation technique may limit the use of these methods. The pain scores will be measured using the scale and statistically analyzed.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • nonvital tooth
  • single rooted tooth
Exclusion Criteria
  • tooth not requiring root canal treatment
  • patients under 18 years old
  • vital tooth
  • tooth having more than 1 canal

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
irrigation activation methodXp-endo Finisher (XPF)Irrigation activation is a crucial stage of root canal treatment. Therefore, the effect of activation methods on post treatment is an important fact for the comfort of patients.
irrigation activation methodPassive Ultrasonic IrrigationIrrigation activation is a crucial stage of root canal treatment. Therefore, the effect of activation methods on post treatment is an important fact for the comfort of patients.
irrigation activation methodEndoActivatorIrrigation activation is a crucial stage of root canal treatment. Therefore, the effect of activation methods on post treatment is an important fact for the comfort of patients.
irrigation activation methodTraditional IrrigationIrrigation activation is a crucial stage of root canal treatment. Therefore, the effect of activation methods on post treatment is an important fact for the comfort of patients.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Incidence of postoperative after endodontic treatment0-48 hours

The incidence and severity of pain will be evaluated by using visual analog scale (VAS). The severity of pain varies between 0 to 10, in which 0 means no pain, whislt 10 means unbearable pain.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Bülent Ecevit University, Faculty of Dentistry

🇹🇷

Zonguldak, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath