跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03658941
NCT03658941已完成不适用

Prophylactic Use of Dural Tenting Sutures in Elective Craniotomies - is it Necessary? A Multicentre Randomised Study.

Medical University of Warsaw5 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 490 人开始时间: 2018年9月7日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
490
试验地点
5
主要终点
Reoperation due to epidural hematoma

研究概览

简要总结

This study evaluates the necessity of dural tenting sutures in craniotomies. The sutures elevate the dura, a layer between the brain and skull. Supposedly, by doing so, they prevent blood collecting between dura mater and the skull. These blood collections, called epidural hematomas, contributed greatly to postoperative mortality in the early days of neurosurgery. There have been several reports questioning the ongoing need for them in neurosurgery, thanks to modern hemostatic techniques. Moreover, it has been published in the literature, and is a common knowledge as well, that some neurosurgeons do not use these sutures at all, and do not have worse outcomes than their colleagues.

In this study, half of the randomly assigned participants will undergo craniotomy without dural tenting sutures and will be considered an intervention group. The other half will undergo craniotomy with these sutures.

详细描述

In the early days of neurosurgery, epidural hemorrhages (EDH) contributed to a high mortality rate after craniotomies. Almost a century ago Walter Dandy reported dural tenting sutures as an effective way of preventing postoperative EDH. Over time, his technique gained in popularity and significance to finally become a neurosurgical standard.

Yet, there have been several retrospective reports questioning the ongoing need for dural tenting sutures. Dandy's explanation that the hemostasis under hypotensive conditions is deceiving and eventually causes EDH may be obsolete. These days, proper intra- and postoperative care, including maintenance of normovolemia and normotension and the use of modern hemostatic agents, may be enough for effective hemostasis. Evading of this suturing technique by some surgeons supports this argument even further.

Thus, there is a fundamental need to evaluate the necessity of dural tenting sutures in an unbiased, evidence-based manner.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Due to the nature of the surgical procedures, the surgeon and the rest of the OR medical team will be aware of the current subject's allocation. However, in each case, the specific OR team aware of the subject's allocation will be different from the investigators performing further evaluation of the given subject. The following study procedures will be in place to ensure double-blind administration of the study.

  • Access to the randomization code will be strictly controlled.
  • The surgeon will receive information on subject's allocation after commencing the surgery.

The study blind will be broken:

  1. During interim monitoring, after recruiting the first 100 patients.
  2. On completion of the clinical study and after the study database has been locked.
  3. When patients' safety requires access to allocation data.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •male or female over 18 and under 75 years old
  • •qualified for an elective supratentorial craniotomy with a diameter of at least 3 cm
  • •Glasgow Coma Scale 15 preoperatively
  • •Modified Rankin Scale 0, 1 or 2 preoperatively

排除标准

  • •Coagulation abnormalities before the surgery
  • •Revision craniotomy
  • •Skull base surgery

研究组 & 干预措施

No dural tenting sutures

Experimental

No dural tenting techniques

干预措施: No dural tenting techniques (Procedure)

Dural tenting sutures

Active Comparator

Dural tenting techniques

干预措施: Dural tenting techniques (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Reoperation due to epidural hematoma

时间窗: During hospitalization for the surgery, approximately 2 days postoperatively

Surgery for the postoperative extradural hematoma

次要结局

  • Postoperative 30-day readmission to a neurosurgical or neurological department(30-day postoperatively)
  • New neurologic deficit or deterioration of a previous one(during hospitalisation, as evaluated 5-7 days postoperatively, or earlier if the patient is discharged before the fifth postsurgical day.)
  • Cerebrospinal fluid leak requiring treatment.(during hospitalisation, as evaluated 5-7 days postoperatively, or earlier if the patient is discharged before the fifth postsurgical day.)
  • Postoperative 30-day mortality(30-day postoperatively)
  • Deterioration of postoperative headaches over 5 Numerical Rating Scale(during hospitalisation, as evaluated 5-7 days postoperatively, or earlier if the patient is discharged before the fifth postsurgical day.)
  • Epidural collection thickness over 3 mm measured radiographically(During hospitalization, approximately 1-3 days postoperatively)
  • Midline shift over 5 mm(During hospitalization, approximately 1-3 days postoperatively)

研究者

发起方
Medical University of Warsaw
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (5)

Loading locations...

相似试验