Ultrasound Guidance Versus Anatomical Landmarks for CVC Catheterisation:

Completed

• Conditions: Success Rate for Subclavian or Femoral Vein Catetherisation
• Interventions: Procedure: Central vein catheterisation

• Registration Number: NCT03207932
• Lead Sponsor: University of Pisa

Brief Summary

anatomical landmarks on the body surface were used to insert central vein catheter. However, ultrasound technique is emerging as a new technique for vein catheterisation. For subclavian and femoral vein catheterisation, up to now, there is a lack of evidence of the superiority of one technique over the other.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2017-07-02
• Study First Submitted QC: 2017-07-03
• Study First Posted: 2017-07-05
• Study Start: 2018-05-10
• Primary Completion: 2019-01-10
• Study Completion: 2019-10-10
• Status Verified: 2020-11
• Last Update Submitted: 2020-11-08
• Last Update Posted: 2020-11-10

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 200

Inclusion Criteria

• patients needing CVC

Exclusion Criteria

• refusal of consent

Study & Design

• Study Type: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Design: Not specified

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
ultrasound	Central vein catheterisation	CVC insertion using ultrasound
landmark technique	Central vein catheterisation	CVC insertion using landmark technique

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
The success rate for succlavic or femoral vein catetherisation using ultrasound versus landmark technique at the first attempt	during catheterization procedure	success rate

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Francesco Forfori; 🇮🇹 Pisa, Italy