A Trial of Traffic Light Labeling With Behavioral Nudges and a Healthy Recipe Database to Increase Selection of Healthier Foods in Client-choice Food Pantries
- Conditions
- Food Selection
- Interventions
- Other: Waitlist ControlBehavioral: Healthy Pantry Program
- Registration Number
- NCT04243252
- Lead Sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Brief Summary
This study is a pilot evaluation of the Healthy Pantry Program, a new behavioral economics-based training that allows pantry staff to learn how to implement nudges integrating traffic-light nutrition labeling and a healthy recipe database in the pantry environment. The hypothesis is that participation the Healthy Pantry Program will lead to increases in pantry purchases of healthy foods.
- Detailed Description
Food insecurity affects more than one in 10 Americans and is associated with poor nutrition and adverse health outcomes, including diabetes, hypertension, and mental health issues. Many food-insecure individuals use food pantries, which provide charitable food, to supplement household food needs. The emergence of client-choice food pantries, where individuals can select the foods they take home, provides a novel opportunity to intervene on the diets of food pantry clients.
This study evaluates the Healthy Pantry Program (HPP) in a sample of 10 food pantries in the greater Boston area. Pantries will be matched on baseline characteristics and randomized 1:1 into participation in HPP (intervention) or wait list (control). Outcomes data will be collected at the pantry and client level. The aims of the study are as follows:
Aim 1: To evaluate whether HPP is associated with increased healthy food purchases from the food bank by intervention food pantries compared to control food pantries.
Aim 2: To evaluate whether HPP is associated with increases in the availability of healthy food in intervention food pantries compared to control food pantries.
Aim 3: To evaluate whether HPP is associated with an increase in healthy food selection and dietary intake by clients of intervention food pantries compared to clients of control food pantries, using a cross-sectional sample of 400 food pantry clients at baseline and 400 food pantry clients at 6-month follow up.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 3
- maximum client-choice (clients can choose all items that they take from pantry)
- operate at least once weekly
- affiliated with the Greater Boston Food Bank
Pantry
- not affiliated with the Greater Boston Food Bank
- operating less than once weekly
- not a maximum client-choice food pantry
- >1 hr drive from Boston
- <50 clients on average per open day
Client Inclusion Criteria (for cross-sectional surveys at baseline and 6-month follow up):
- ≥18 years old
- pantry client
- speaks English or Spanish
Client Exclusion Criteria:
- <18 years old
- does not speak English or Spanish
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Control Food Pantries Waitlist Control Food pantries will continue to operate as usual during the study period; the effect on pantries and their clients will be measured. Intervention Food Pantries Healthy Pantry Program Food pantries will complete online training to help them rank foods by nutritional value and promote those foods to pantry clients; the effect on pantries and their clients will be measured.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Monthly change in proportion of green-labeled foods purchased by food pantries from the food bank Collected from the electronic ordering system at baseline and prospectively each month for 9 months Monthly change from baseline values of healthier foods purchased by pantries from the food bank in the proportion of green-labeled foods.
Monthly change in the Healthy Purchasing Score of foods purchased by food pantries from the food bank Collected from the electronic ordering system at baseline and prospectively each month for 9 months Monthly change from baseline values of healthier foods purchased by pantries from the food bank in a weighted Healthy Purchasing Score that includes all foods (range: 0-1, higher scores represent healthier selection)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in self-reported fruit and vegetable intake of pantry clients Assessed at baseline and 6 months Change from baseline fruit and vegetable intake in cup equivalents measured by the Dietary Screener from the California Health Information Survey 2005
Change in food availability at food pantries Assessed at baseline and 6 months Change from baseline in food availability score using the Healthy Food Pantry Assessment Tool (range: 0-45, higher scores represent greater food availability)
Change in healthier food selection by pantry clients Assessed at baseline and 6 months Change from baseline in pantry basket inventories of pantry clients measured by Healthy Purchasing Score for each basket (range: 0-1, higher scores represent healthier selection)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Massachusetts General Hospital
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States