Post Marketing Study of an in Vitro Diagnostic Test for Direct Oral Anticoagulants (Apixaban, Edoxaban, Rivaroxaban, Dabigatran) in Urine
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 880
- Locations
- 18
- Primary Endpoint
- Accuracy of Factor Xa and Thrombin Inhibitors Pads of DOAC Dipstick From Urine Samples
Study Overview
Brief Summary
This trial is conducted to assess the performance and handling of the in vitro diagnostic (IVD) device for oral direct factor Xa and thrombin inhibitors from urine samples of patients on treatment with direct oral anticoagulants Apixaban, Edoxaban, Rivaroxaban, and Dabigatran (DOAC) in an actual point-of-care (POCT) setting in comparison to results obtained by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) from urine samples.
This trial is conducted to assess the performance and handling of the IVD for oral direct factor Xa and thrombin inhibitors from urine samples of patients on treatment with DOACs in an actual point-of-care setting in comparison to results obtained by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) from urine samples.
"publication Thromb Haemost. 2019 Nov 8. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1700545. [Epub ahead of print]"
Detailed Description
This prospective, open-label, controlled, not randomized Performance Assessment will be conducted as a multicenter Performance Assessment in Germany.
The trial investigates the sensitivity and specificity of a POCT for DOAC, i.e., the rate of correct positive, false positive, correct negative and false negative results in the point-of-care setting. The IVD is a test to determine absence or presence of DOAC in urine - Test A tests for oral direct factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban), Test B for oral thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran).
Two groups of patients will be included:
- Test group A: Patients under therapy with oral direct factor Xa inhibitor (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) (n=440)
- Test group B: Patients under therapy with oral thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran) (n=440) No control group of patients not treated with a DOAC is required, as patients take either oral direct factor Xa inhibitors (Test group A) or oral thrombin inhibitors (Test group B), never both. Thus, patients in Test group A are negative for oral thrombin inhibitors and can serve as negative control for Test group B, and vice versa.
The point-of-care test (POCT) is a color-indicator diagnostic medical urine dipstick test for assessing the presence of oral direct factor Xa inhibitor (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) and thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran). The principle of the diagnostic test is based on the development of different colors on the indicator part of the dipstick in the presence or absence of oral direct factor Xa (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) and thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran). The colors for the test were chosen so that they could easily be read by the naked eye, with little possibility of incorrect identification of colors. The results for presence or absence will be compared with the concentration of DOAC analyzed by LC-MS/MS.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Observational Model
- Other
- Time Perspective
- Prospective
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Fully signed and dated written informed consent
- •Age >18 years
- •Patient is either under therapy with rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban or dabigatran for at least 1 week
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients not able to provide urine samples.
- •Patients not able to understand the informed consent or severe mentally disabled.
- •Patients in the end-stage of a severe disease.
- •"publication Thromb Haemost. 2019 Nov
- •doi: 10.1055/s-0039-
- •[Epub ahead of print]"
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Accuracy of Factor Xa and Thrombin Inhibitors Pads of DOAC Dipstick From Urine Samples
Time Frame: during urine collection and bioanalytical quantification, any time between August 2018 and April 2019
Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry versus DOAC Dipstick, qualitative analysis of results
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
