Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00216320
NCT00216320
Completed
Not Applicable

A Three-Arm, Randomized Crossover Study Comparing the Innovative Neurotronics WalkAide™ System to Ankle-Foot Orthosis [AFO]

Innovative Neurotronics5 sites in 1 country121 target enrollmentSeptember 2005
ConditionsStroke

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Stroke
Sponsor
Innovative Neurotronics
Enrollment
121
Locations
5
Primary Endpoint
Figure 8 Walking Speed Before and After Intervention.
Status
Completed
Last Updated
13 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

To assess the effectiveness of a new stimulator (WalkAide) for the treatment of foot drop. The comparison will involve physical measurements (e.g. walking speed, physiological cost index, Modified Rivermead Mobility Index, etc.) and questionnaires on the quality of life and acceptance of the technology by stroke survivors.

Detailed Description

Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United States and other developed countries and a major source of disability, often leading to hospitalization. Prognosis for regaining the ability to walk is good, with 64% of those initially dependent in walking regaining independence by three months. However, many gait abnormalities persist. Reduced hip, knee and ankle excursions during swing are among the persistent gait abnormalities contributing to poor or inefficient limb clearance. This is generally referred to as "foot drop", since the foot drops or drags along the ground during the swing phase. Swing phase abnormalities can result in decreased velocity, limited endurance and an increased risk for falls. These factors can limit mobility and independence in the community. Therefore, intervention is warranted. The conventional approach to address the poor swing limb function, specifically, insufficient ankle dorsiflexion, is the prescription of an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO). An AFO commonly limits ankle plantarflexion to enhance limb clearance during swing. An alternative approach is to stimulate the ankle dorsiflexors electrically during swing phase to reproduce motion, which can no longer be performed volitionally. The WalkAide is a new foot drop stimulator. This small, self-contained device attaches to the leg below the knee. The WalkAide contains a number of patented features, including a tilt sensor that measures the orientation of the leg with respect to the vertical. When the leg is tilted back at the end of stance, stimulation of the common peroneal nerve is initiated. This produces flexion of the ankle and other joints (if a flexion reflex is elicited) so that the leg can clear the ground during swing. When the leg is tilted forward at the end of swing phase, the stimulus is terminated. The electrodes attach to the inside of a cuff that is molded to the leg for reproducible positioning from day to day. The device is also designed so that all operations can be done with a single hand, since hemiparesis may prevent the subject from using the other hand. Because of its enhanced features, the WalkAide is anticipated to increase walking speed and improve the quality of life.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 2005
End Date
November 2008
Last Updated
13 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Crossover
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Innovative Neurotronics
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older
  • Diagnosed with cerebrovascular accident (CVA) within the last 365 days
  • Inadequate dorsiflexion during the swing phase of gait, resulting in inadequate limb clearance
  • Medically stable for six months prior to the most recent episode of stroke resulting in hemiplegia or hemiparesis with foot drop
  • Medical clearance by the attending physician to participate in the study
  • Expectation that current medication can be maintained without drastic change for at least six months
  • Adequate stability at the ankle during stance (with stimulation)
  • Adequate cognitive and communication function to give informed consent, understand the training instructions, use the device and give adequate feedback
  • Ability to ambulate with or without an assistive device (or assistance) at least 10 meters

Exclusion Criteria

  • Lower motor neuron injury with inadequate response to stimulation
  • History of falls greater than once a week prior to the CVA
  • Severe cardiac disease such as myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure or a demand pacemaker (or other electrical stimulator)
  • Fixed ankle contractures of five degrees of plantarflexion with knee extended
  • Moderate to normal ambulation velocity (greater than 1.2 m/s)
  • Unable to operate the device safely by self and caregiver assistance not available
  • Need for an AFO for stance control of the foot, ankle and/or knee
  • Comorbid conditions unlikely to survive one year
  • Pre-existing history of seizure disorder prior to most recent episode of CVA
  • Pre-existing pathology resulting in a significant disruption in alignment or function of the lower extremity

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Figure 8 Walking Speed Before and After Intervention.

Time Frame: baseline, 6, 6.2 and 12 weeks

Subjects walked a 10 meter Figure 8 pattern for four minutes at fastest safe speed. This was measured under two conditions: On condition - the WA turned on or the AFO worn by the subject; off condition - The WA turned off or the AFO not worn by the subject. The endpoints were analyzed at 6, and 12 weeks

Physiological Cost Index Before and After Intervention.

Time Frame: baseline, 6, 6.2 and 12 weeks

PCI is the difference between resting heart rate and active heart rate during walking, divided by average walking speed. This was measured under two conditions: On condition - the WA turned on or the AFO worn by the subject; off condition - The WA turned off or the AFO not worn by the subject. The endpoints were analyzed at 6, and 12 weeks

10 Meter Walking Speed Before and After Intervention.

Time Frame: baseline, 6, 6.2 and 12 weeks

Subjects walked 10 meters at their fastest safe speed. This was measured under two conditions: On condition - the WA turned on or the AFO worn by the subject; off condition - The WA turned off or the AFO not worn by the subject. The endpoints were analyzed at 6, and 12 weeks

Secondary Outcomes

  • Number of Subjects Who Preferred Use of WalkAide Over the Use of AFO(12 weeks)

Study Sites (5)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials