European Multicenter Study Radiofrequency (RF) Versus Cryo in Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia (AVNRT)
- Conditions
- Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia
- Interventions
- Procedure: RF-ablationProcedure: cryo ablation
- Registration Number
- NCT00196222
- Lead Sponsor
- Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
- Brief Summary
In this randomized study, two energy sources for the ablation of AV nodal reentry tachycardia are compared: The standard technique of radiofrequency energy delivery is compared with the new approach of cryo-energy application.
- Detailed Description
The ablation of AV nodal reentry tachycardia with radiofrequency (RF) energy delivering catheters is a standard procedure and in experienced EP laboratories, the safety and efficacy of this approach is very high.
However, the potential complication of higher degree AV conduction block, requiring in some instances implantation of a pacemaker, is a major drawback of this approach.
We want to compare in this randomized study the safety and efficacy of standard RF ablation with the cryo-ablation technique. This relatively new technique is thought to offer more safety concerning higher degree AV conduction block.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 509
- Age between 18 and 80 years old
- Clinical diagnosis of AVNRT (ECG/patients history)
- Electrophysiologically confirmed (invasively assessed) diagnosis of AVNRT
- Written informed consent
- Prior ablation for AVNRT
- Congenital heart disease interfering with the ablation method
- Prior cardiac surgery
- Medical or psychiatric disorder interfering with study protocol or data acquisition
- Exclusion of the patient by the study investigator
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 1 RF-ablation RF ablation/modulation of the slow pathway in AV nodal reentrant tachycardia 2 cryo ablation cryo energy ablation/modulation of the slow pathway in AV nodal reentrant tachycardia
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Combined endpoint of safety and efficacy of cryo ablation compared with RF ablation for procedure and 6 months follow-up data. 6 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (10)
Kerckhoffklinik GmbH EPU
🇩🇪Bad Nauheim, Germany
Charite Berlin Virchow - Klinikum Med. Klinik
🇩🇪Berlin, Germany
Universitaetsklinikum Giessen EPU
🇩🇪Giessen, Germany
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Duesseldorf Kardiologie
🇩🇪Duesseldorf, Germany
Universitaetsklinikum Bonn Med. Klinik II
🇩🇪Bonn, Germany
Klinikum Luedenscheid Kardiologie
🇩🇪Luedenscheid, Germany
Universitaetsklinikum Tuebingen Med. Klinik/Abt.III
🇩🇪Tuebingen, Germany
Klinikum der Stadt Mannheim Med. Klinik I
🇩🇪Mannheim, Germany
Universitaetsklinikum Ulm Innere Med. II
🇩🇪Ulm, Germany
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
🇩🇪Munich, Germany