MedPath

European Multicenter Study Radiofrequency (RF) Versus Cryo in Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia (AVNRT)

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia
Interventions
Procedure: RF-ablation
Procedure: cryo ablation
Registration Number
NCT00196222
Lead Sponsor
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
Brief Summary

In this randomized study, two energy sources for the ablation of AV nodal reentry tachycardia are compared: The standard technique of radiofrequency energy delivery is compared with the new approach of cryo-energy application.

Detailed Description

The ablation of AV nodal reentry tachycardia with radiofrequency (RF) energy delivering catheters is a standard procedure and in experienced EP laboratories, the safety and efficacy of this approach is very high.

However, the potential complication of higher degree AV conduction block, requiring in some instances implantation of a pacemaker, is a major drawback of this approach.

We want to compare in this randomized study the safety and efficacy of standard RF ablation with the cryo-ablation technique. This relatively new technique is thought to offer more safety concerning higher degree AV conduction block.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
509
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age between 18 and 80 years old
  • Clinical diagnosis of AVNRT (ECG/patients history)
  • Electrophysiologically confirmed (invasively assessed) diagnosis of AVNRT
  • Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • Prior ablation for AVNRT
  • Congenital heart disease interfering with the ablation method
  • Prior cardiac surgery
  • Medical or psychiatric disorder interfering with study protocol or data acquisition
  • Exclusion of the patient by the study investigator

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
1RF-ablationRF ablation/modulation of the slow pathway in AV nodal reentrant tachycardia
2cryo ablationcryo energy ablation/modulation of the slow pathway in AV nodal reentrant tachycardia
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Combined endpoint of safety and efficacy of cryo ablation compared with RF ablation for procedure and 6 months follow-up data.6 months
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (10)

Kerckhoffklinik GmbH EPU

🇩🇪

Bad Nauheim, Germany

Charite Berlin Virchow - Klinikum Med. Klinik

🇩🇪

Berlin, Germany

Universitaetsklinikum Giessen EPU

🇩🇪

Giessen, Germany

Evangelisches Krankenhaus Duesseldorf Kardiologie

🇩🇪

Duesseldorf, Germany

Universitaetsklinikum Bonn Med. Klinik II

🇩🇪

Bonn, Germany

Klinikum Luedenscheid Kardiologie

🇩🇪

Luedenscheid, Germany

Universitaetsklinikum Tuebingen Med. Klinik/Abt.III

🇩🇪

Tuebingen, Germany

Klinikum der Stadt Mannheim Med. Klinik I

🇩🇪

Mannheim, Germany

Universitaetsklinikum Ulm Innere Med. II

🇩🇪

Ulm, Germany

Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

🇩🇪

Munich, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath