Comparison of insertion efficacy of ProSeal and i-gel under cricoid pressure
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Patients who undergo general aneshtesia with SGD
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000022597
- Lead Sponsor
- Osaka Medical College
- Brief Summary
Insertion time was significantly smaller in i-gel trial than in the ProSeal trial. Number of insertion was signficiantly smaller in the i-gel trial than in the ProSeal Trial. The rate of appropriate position was significantly higher in the i-gel trial than in the ProSeal trial.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete: follow-up complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
Difficult airway anticipated patients. Patients for emergency surgery.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Insertion number and time
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Bronchofiberscope finding postoperative pharyngeal pain and hoarseness