MedPath

Safety and Efficacy of Periodontal Surgery in Supra-alveolar-type Defects With or Without Straumann® Emdogain

Terminated
Conditions
Periodontal Attachment Loss
Periodontal Diseases
Interventions
Device: Emdogain
Procedure: Periodontal surgery
Registration Number
NCT01614925
Lead Sponsor
Institut Straumann AG
Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that in supra-alveolar-type defects (i.e., defects displaying a predominately horizontal pattern of bone loss), periodontal surgery with the additional use of Straumann® Emdogain will result in significantly higher Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) gain compared to periodontal surgery without Straumann® Emdogain.

Detailed Description

The following secondary endpoints will be evaluated during the study:

* Change in Gingival Margin (GM) at 12 months after surgery compared to baseline

* Change in Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) at 12 months after surgery compared to baseline

* Comparison of early wound healing index (EHI) at 4 weeks after surgery between treatment groups

* Comparison of post-surgical pain at 4 weeks after surgery between treatment groups

* Change in Bleeding on Probing (BoP) at 12 months after surgery compared to baseline

* Change in root dentin hypersensitivity at 12 months after surgery compared to baseline

* Change in full mouth plaque index (PI) at 12 months after surgery compared to baseline

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
35
Inclusion Criteria
  • Subjects must have advanced periodontitis:
  • presence of supra-alveolar-type defects (i.e., defects displaying a predominantly horizontal pattern of bone loss) at a minimum of two adjacent teeth and a maximum of 7 adjacent teeth (FDI positions 17-27 or 37-47) in either the maxilla or the mandible with a PPD of ≥6 mm at a minimum on one site of the examined teeth
  • Teeth must have < Class II mobility
  • Teeth must have horizontal bone loss with an intrabony component of <2 mm as defined by radiographic evaluation
  • Subjects must have adequate oral hygiene (full mouth plaque index (PI) of <25% at baseline (i.e., following initial non-surgical periodontal therapy)
  • Subjects must have adequate control of inflammation (full mouth bleeding on probing (FMBP) of <25% at baseline (i.e., following initial non-surgical periodontal therapy)
  • Subjects must have voluntarily signed the informed consent form before any study related procedures
  • Subjects must be males and females of at least 18 years of age
  • Subjects must be committed to the study and the required follow-up visits
  • Subjects must be in good general health as assessed by the investigator at time of surgery
Exclusion Criteria

Pre-surgical exclusion criteria:

  • Subjects with any contraindications for oral surgical procedures
  • Subjects with uncontrolled diabetes or other uncontrolled systemic diseases
  • Subjects with disorders or treatments that compromise wound healing
  • Subjects with medical conditions requiring chronic high dose steroid therapy
  • Subjects with bone metabolic diseases
  • Subjects with radiation or other immuno-oppressive therapy
  • Subjects with infections or vascular impairment at the surgical site
  • Subjects who are on antibiotic treatment or chronic anti-inflammatory treatment (≥3 times per week) within 4 weeks prior to surgery.
  • Subjects with the presence of oral lesions (such as ulceration, malignancy)
  • Subjects with mucosal diseases (e.g., lichen planus, mouth ulcer)
  • Subjects with a history of malignant disease in the oral cavity or previous radiotherapy to the head or neck
  • Subjects with inadequate oral hygiene or unmotivated for adequate home care
  • Subjects that have been treated with an investigational drug or device within the 30 day period immediately prior to surgery on study day 0.
  • Subjects who currently smoke
  • Female subjects who are nursing, pregnant, or plan to become pregnant

Secondary exclusion criteria:

  • Subjects with an osseous defect with an intrabony component of ≥2 mm or involving furcation involvement ≥ class II at the tooth of interest

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
EmdogainEmdogainPeriodontal surgery with the additional use of Straumann® Emdogain
Periodontal SurgeryPeriodontal surgeryPeriodontal surgery alone
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Clinical Attachment Level12 Months

The change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) from Baseline to 12 Months. CAL measurements will be derived from the Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) and Gingival Margin (GM) measurements as follows: CAL = PPD - GM.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Plaque Index (PI) From Baseline to 12 Months12 months after baseline

The PI was recorded according to O'Leary et al. \[1972\] as a binary response at the mesial, distal, facial and lingual surfaces on the study teeth. The percentage of positive events per total sites was calculated for each group. The outcome measure was the change between baseline and 12 months. Negative values indicate a decrease in PI.

Change in Gingival Margin (GM) From Baseline to 12 Months12 months after baseline

GM was measured by recording the distance from the Cemento-Enamel Junction (CEJ) to the margin of the gingiva at 6 sites (mesio-vestibular, mid-vestibular, disto-vestibular, mesio-oral, mid-oral, disto-oral) on the study teeth. Negative value for GM indicates gingival recession. A positive value for the GM indicates the gingiva was covering the CEJ.

Comparison of Post-surgical Pain at 4 Weeks After Baseline4 weeks after baseline

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for post-surgical pain, minimum value=0, maximum value=10, higher score means worse outcome

Change in Bleeding on Probing (BoP) From Baseline to 12 Months12 months after baseline

The presence of BoP was recorded as a binary response on 6 sites (mesio-vestibular, midvestibular, disto-vestibular, mesio-oral, mid-oral, and disto-oral) on the study teeth. The percentage of positive events per total probing sites was calculated for each group. The outcome measure was the change between baseline and 12 months. Negative values indicate a decrease in BoP.

Change in Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) From Baseline to 12 Months12 months after baseline

PPD was measured before the area is anaesthetized by recording the distance from the gingival margin to the bottom of the probable pocket at 6 sites (mesio-vestibular, mid-vestibular, disto-vestibular, mesiooral, mid-oral, and disto-oral) on the study teeth.Negative value for PPD indicates reduction of pocket depth.

Early Wound Healing Index (EHI) Assessment at 4 Weeks After Baseline4 weeks after baseline

Postoperative wound healing was assessed by the EHI according to Wachtel et al. \[2003\] by visual assessment:

1. complete flap closure - no fibrin line in the interproximal area

2. complete flap closure - fine fibrin line in the interproximal area

3. complete flap closure - fibrin clot in the interproximal area

4. incomplete flap closure - partial necrosis of the interproximal tissue

5. incomplete flap closure - complete necrosis of the interproximal tissue The outcome measure was the percentage of EHI category 1 (complete flap closure - no fibrin line in the interproximal area)

Change in Root Dentin Hypersensitivity (RDH) From Baseline to 12 Months12 months after baseline

RDH was examined by physical testing using cold air as a stimulus. The percentage of positive events per total testing sites was calculated for each group. The outcome measure was the change between baseline and 12 months. Negative values indicate a decrease in RDH.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Alabama at Birmingham

🇺🇸

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath