MedPath

Comparison Of Deep Versus Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade on Intra-Operative Blood Loss During Spinal Surgery

Early Phase 1
Conditions
Spine Fracture
Interventions
Device: nerve stimulator
Registration Number
NCT05294926
Lead Sponsor
Assiut University
Brief Summary

Reduction of intra-operative blood loss

Detailed Description

Spine surgery is usually performed using a posterior approach with the patient in the prone position, but on the other hand this position causes venous engorgement in the back and increases bleeding with the risk of interruption of surgery and increases the need for blood transfusion. The prone position also produces undesirable haemodynamic changes resulting from compression of large vessels and decreased venous return to the heart.

Deep neuromuscular blockade has been shown to improve surgical conditions compared with moderate neuromuscular blockade in various surgical procedures specially different laparoscopic procedures to optimize surgical field conditions. In spine surgery, although many other factors such as the body habitus of the patient and the surgical equipment are important, an improvement in surgical field conditions can be achieved through reducing muscle tension in the back, and also reducing intra-abdominal and thoracic pressure. This goal may be attainable by using deep neuromuscular blockade. Better operating conditions offer the surgeon easier access to the surgical field with less damage. However, the effect of deep neuromuscular blockade on surgical bleeding in spinal surgery in the prone position has been yet under evaluation.

The investigators hypothesise that deep, compared with moderate, neuromuscular blockade would cause less surgical bleeding in spinal surgery in the prone position. The investigators aim to evaluate the effects and superiority of deep neuromuscular blockade on surgical bleeding in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery in the prone position.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
88
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age 18- 65 years.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA) I - III
  • Patients scheduled for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (2-level or 3-level).
Exclusion Criteria
  • Urgent or emergency case or re-operation.
  • History of pre-operative anticoagulant medication or an indication for peri-operative anticoagulant medication.
  • ASA classification more than III.
  • Age less than 16 years.
  • Reduced left and right ventricular function (ejection fraction <40%).
  • Previous respiratory disease or a diagnosed neuromuscular disorder.
  • Pre-operative dysrhythmia.
  • Allergy to neuromuscular blocking agents.
  • Family history of malignant hyperthermia.
  • Decreased renal function (serum creatinine level more than twice the normal range, urine output <0.5 ml kg/h, glomerular filtration ratio <60 ml/ h).

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
deep neuromuscular blockadenerve stimulator-
moderate neuromuscular blockadenerve stimulator-
deep neuromuscular blockadeRocuronium-
moderate neuromuscular blockadeRocuronium-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Volume of surgical bleeding.Baseline

Volume of surgical bleeding will be recorded before surgical field lavage, and again at the end of surgery, by measuring the total volume of blood collected in the suction bottle minus the lavage fluid volume used for wound irrigation.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
surgeon's satisfaction with the operating conditionsBaseline

The score for the surgeon's satisfaction (lowest, 1; highest, 5) with the surgical conditions will be assessed at the end of surgery. Extremely poor (Score 1) indicated that the surgeon is unable to work because of an inability to obtain a visible field due to inadequate muscle relaxation; poor (Score 2) indicated that there is a visible field, but the surgeon is severely hampered by inadequate muscle relaxation; acceptable (Score 3) indicated that there is a wide visible field and acceptable muscle relaxation; good (Score 4) indicated a wide working field with adequate muscle relaxation; excellent (Score 5) indicated a wide visible working field without any muscle rigidity.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath