From Lesion to Resolution: A CBCT-Based retrospective study comparing bioactive materials for Non-Surgical Root Canal Therapy
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 40
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Significant difference between all three materials
研究概览
简要总结
Aim:-
To evaluate the effect of non-surgical healing on large periapical lesions of teeth using bioactive materials with the aid of CBCT scans after a follow up period of 6 months and 1 year.
Materials and method:-
A total of 40 teeth were taken for this retrospective study with single or multirooted teeth and periapical pathology of more than 4mm in diameter present with pre-operative and follow-up CBCTs available. All the cases considered underwent endodontic treatment using one of three bioactive materials (MTA, Biodentine, Bioceramics). Assessment of healing was done based on radiographic CBCT scans and CBCT-PAI criteria. The teeth were divided into healing, healed or diseased based on changes in the CBCT PAI score after 6 months and 1 year. All the data was recorded in a tabular form and sent for statistical analysis using chi-square test, t-test and Friedmann’s test.
Results:-
There was no statistically significant difference in age-wise, gender-wise or arch-wise distribution. Whilst there was a statistically significant difference in individual teeth after 6 months and 1 year, with maxillary incisors showing the highest percentage of healing after 1 year. Increase in healed cases was also seen across all groups after 1 year. No significant difference was seen between the use of the three bioactive materials
Conclusion:-
Amongst all the teeth assessed, single rooted maxillary teeth showed the highest amount of healing. All three Bioactive materials showed a favourable outcome for the treatment regardless of the material used
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Patients with teeth having periapical pathology of more than 4 mm in diameter, having pre-operative and follow up CBCTs available, presence of swelling or sinus tract and teeth with appropriate hard tissue structure left to be restored.
排除标准
- •Cases needing endodontic retreatment, teeth with fractures or perforations and endo-perio lesion.
结局指标
主要结局
Significant difference between all three materials
时间窗: after 6 months and one year
次要结局
- No significant difference between all three materials (MTA, Biodentine, Bioceramics)(after 6 months & one year)
研究者
Mohil Kale
College Of Dental Sciences And Research Center
