MedPath

A COMPARITIVE TRIAL OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED VERSUS CONVENTIONAL INJECTION FOR CAUDAL BLOCK IN CHILDREN UNDERGOING INFRA UMBILICAL SURGERIES

Completed
Conditions
Diseases of the genitourinary system,
Registration Number
CTRI/2019/02/017421
Lead Sponsor
Sri Ramachandra University
Brief Summary

·       Regional anaesthetic techniques are known to  reduce the post-operative morbidity, provide early mobilisation and reduce opioid requirements. Caudal epidural block is a widely used regional anaesthetic technique especially in paediatric surgery to provide intraoperative and post-operative analgesia in surgeries below umbilical level(T10-S5 dermatomes). Conventional single shot caudal block technique involves the risk of dural or vascular puncture, intra osseous injection, soft tissue bulging and systemic toxicity. Many anatomic variations have been reported for sacral hiatus and sacral cornua. Therefore, success rate of classic caudal epidural technique has been reported to be about 75%. Ultrasonography is helpful for visualisation of the sacral hiatus, sacrococcygeal ligament, duramater, epidural space and distribution of local anaesthetic agent within the epidural space therefore significantly increases the block success rate. Indian data on caudal epidural block has been scarce and world over, the number of studies on ultrasound guided caudal epidural block is minimal. Hence we wish to conduct a randomised control study comparing ultrasound guided caudal block versus conventional caudal block in children undergoing elective infraumbilical surgeries. The primary outcome would be the first puncture success rate comparing both the arms. Other outcomes such as  block performing time, success of the block and complications would also be assessed. The study would be conducted over a period of 6 months in the department of anaesthesia at a tertiary care centre hospital in southern India.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Completed
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
106
Inclusion Criteria

patients undergoing elective infra-umbilical surgeries with ASA physical status I and II.

Exclusion Criteria

ASA physical status III and above Emergency surgeries Infection at the site of caudal injection Sacral bone abnormalities Bleeding disorders Allergy to local anaesthetics.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
First puncture success rateReaching sacral canal or sacral hiatus with a single needle orientation on 1st puncture without withdrawal from skin.
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Block performing timeTime from needle insertion to termination of local anaesthetic administration
Successful blockDefined as absence of limb movements and no increase in heart rate or mean arterial pressure above 15% from baseline on skin incision
Complications(if any)Vascular puncture, subcutaneous tissue bulging,Dural puncture and local anaesthetic toxicity

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Sri Ramachandra University

🇮🇳

Chennai, TAMIL NADU, India

Sri Ramachandra University
🇮🇳Chennai, TAMIL NADU, India
Navya Sri Lalitha
Principal investigator
8106157890
navya.kollipara@gmail.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.