Influence of Timing of Implant Placement on Early Healing Molecular Events
- Conditions
- Healing WoundBiomarkersDental ImplantSaliva
- Interventions
- Other: Immediate implant placement and guided bone regeneration (Test)Other: Late implant placement and guided bone regeneration (Control)
- Registration Number
- NCT06276335
- Lead Sponsor
- Queen Mary University of London
- Brief Summary
Dental implants have been on the market for several years and they are routinely used to replace single/multiple missing teeth with a high success rate. However, there is still a limited number of studies comparing the influence of timing of implant placement on wound healing. In addition, there is no data available on the signaling pathways and the expression of healing biomarkers involved in the early stages of osseointegration after immediate implant placement (IP) or delayed implant placement (DP).
The primary objective of this study is to describe changes in the expression of inflammatory, angiogenesis and osseous biomarkers of saliva at 1, 3, 7, 15 and 30 days and of PICF at 3, 7, 15 and 30 days after immediate implant placement (IP) compared with delayed placement (DP).
- Detailed Description
This is a two-centre prospective, parallel-group pilot study which will consist of 10 to 11 visits over a minimum period of 16 months. The study will take place at the Centre for Oral Clinical Research (COCR), at the Institute of Dentistry, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London (main centre), United Kingdom and at Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, University of Zurich, Zurich in accordance with local guidelines and procedures/ interventions detailed below.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 24
- Age ≥25 years old
- Good/controlled medical and psychological health
- Good oral hygiene (FMPS≤20%)
- Presence of a tooth in the aesthetic region (from incisor to second premolar) in need of extraction and further oral rehabilitation with a single dental implant.
- For the IP group, the extraction socket should fulfil the following parameters, as described by the 5th ITI consensus [46]: intact socket wall; facial bone wall ≥1mm in thickness; no acute infection at the site; availability of bone apical and palatal to the socket to provide primary stability.
- At least one neighbouring natural tooth.
- A functional occlusion with a minimum of four occlusal units (i.e., pairs of occluding posterior teeth).
- Willingness to read and sign a copy of the Informed Consent Form (ICF) after reading the Patient Information Sheet (PIS), and after the nature of the study has been fully explained and potential questions fully answered.
- Any known systemic disease severely affecting bone metabolism (e.g., Cushing's syndrome, Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis or diabetes type I and uncontrolled diabetes type II).
- Self-reported HIV or viral hepatitis.
- Self-reported alcoholism or chronic drug abuse.
- Smokers (including current smokers or former smokers who had quit for < 3 months); patients reporting use of vape/e-cigarettes will also be excluded.
- Self-reported pregnancy or lactation (this criterion is due to oral tissue changes related to pregnancy and nursing, which can affect interpretation of study results).
- Chronic treatment (i.e., 2 weeks or more) with any medication known to affect oral status or bone metabolism (e.g., bisphosphonates, hormone replacement therapy, immunosuppressants) within 1 month before baseline visit.
- Chronic treatment with anticoagulants (including Aspirin), corticosteroids, immunosuppressants or other medications that may influence blood coagulation/count.
- Antibiotic or anti-inflammatory therapy during the month preceding the baseline exam.
- Untreated caries lesions and untreated/uncontrolled periodontal disease; If patients require periodontal treatment (non-surgical and/or surgical), this will be arranged outside the study protocol and completed prior to enrolment;
- Inadequate keratinized tissue width (<2 mm) in the mid-buccal aspect of the area to be treated in the study.
- Physical handicaps that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene in the area of implant placement.
- Patients requiring maxillary sinus lift surgery before implant placement.
- Self-reported bruxism.
- Patients not willing to receive animal-derived biomaterials for GBR.
- Patients suffering from a known psychological disorder or with limited mental capacity or language skills such that study information could not be understood, informed consent could not be obtained, or simple instructions could not be followed.
- Other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with trial participation or may interfere with the interpretation of trial results and, in the judgement of the investigator, would make the subject inappropriate for entry into this trial.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Immediate implant placement and conventional loading (Test) Immediate implant placement and guided bone regeneration (Test) In this group, a dental implant will be placed on the same day as tooth extraction and loaded after 3 months Late implant placement and conventional loading (Control) Late implant placement and guided bone regeneration (Control) In this group, a dental implant will be placed after complete bone healing (4 - 6 months after tooth extraction) and loaded after 3 months
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Changes in the expression of inflammatory, angiogenesis and osseous biomarkers of PICF and saliva 1, 3, 7, 15 and 30 days after immediate or delayed implant placement The expression of inflammatory, angiogenesis and osseous biomarkers of PICF at 3, 7, 15 and 30 days after immediate implant placement (IP) or delayed placement (DP) and of saliva at day 1, 3, 7, 15 and 30
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Peri-implant bone level 6 months after implant loading Peri-implant bone level 6 months after loading, using CBCT images
Blood flow changes immediately after, 1, 3, 7, 15 and 30 days after immediate or delayed implant placement Blood flow changes immediately after, at 1, 3, 7, 15 and 30 days after implant placement
Soft tissue volume changes immediately after,1, 3, 7, 15, 30 days and 3 months after immediate or delayed implant placement, at loading and 6 months after implant loading Soft tissue volume changes immediately after, at 1, 3, 7, 15, 30 days and 3 months after immediate or delayed implant placement, at loading and 6 months after implant loading
Changes in the pink esthetic score (PES) 6 months after implant loading Changes in the pink esthetic score (PES) from loading to 6 months after loading
Full mouth bleeding score (FMBS) 6 months after implant loading FMBS will be recorded as percentage of total surfaces (6 aspects per tooth/implant), which reveal the presence of bleeding within 10 - 30 seconds following periodontal probing. A binary score will be assigned to each surface (1 for bleeding present, 0 for bleeding absent).
Probing pocket depth (PPD) 6 months after implant loading PPD will be measured in mm using a University of North Carolina (UNC-15) periodontal probe at six sites per tooth/ implant (i.e., mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, lingual, and distolingual).
Patient satisfaction at 6 months after loading 6 months after implant loading Patient satisfaction regarding the overall implant treatment using a subjective outcome questionnaire at 6 months post loading.
Changes in the white esthetic score (WES) 6 months after implant loading Changes in the white esthetic score (WES) from loading to 6 months after loading
Implant survival 6 months after implant loading Implant functionally present in the mouth
Full mouth plaque score (FMPS) 6 months after implant loading FMPS will be recorded as a percentage of total surfaces (6 sites per tooth/implant), which reveal the presence of plaque. A binary score will be assigned to each surface (1 for plaque present, 0 for absent).
Suppuration 6 months after implant loading Suppuration will be recorded as percentage of total surfaces (6 aspects per tooth/implant), which reveal the presence of suppuration following periodontal probing. A binary score will be assigned to each surface (1 for suppuration present, 0 for suppuration absent).
Changes in the papilla fill index (PFI) 6 months after implant loading Changes in the papilla fill index (PFI) from loading to 6 months after loading
Gingival recession (REC) 6 months after implant loading REC will be measured in mm using a University of North Carolina (UNC-15) periodontal probe at six sites per tooth/ implant (i.e., mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, lingual, and distolingual).
Clinical attachment level (CAL) 6 months after implant loading CAL will be calculated considering the values for PPD and REC in mm
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Centre for Oral Clinical Research
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom