MedPath

Immediate Implant Placement With or Without Buccal Bone Dehiscence

Completed
Conditions
Dental Implant Failed
Interventions
Procedure: gap filling
Procedure: flap elevation and guided bone regeneration
Procedure: connective tissue graft
Registration Number
NCT05445986
Lead Sponsor
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Brief Summary

Immediate implant placement has been advantageous in terms of reduced treatment time and fewer surgical interventions. Given the fact that the level of buccal bone acts as a major prognostic factor for IIP, the indications for immediate implant placement were suggested to be limited to intact alveolar sockets.In recent years, many attempts have been performed to compensate for the alveolar ridge resorption in immediate implant placement in compromised sockets. The clinical outcomes of IIP with guided tissue regeneration and connective tissue grafting using papilla preservation technique in compromised extraction sockets has not been previously reported.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
29
Inclusion Criteria
  • patients with anterior failing teeth (from cainine to cainine) with the presence of neighbouring teeth
  • sufficient bone volume to achieve primary stability at implant insertion
Exclusion Criteria
  • with uncontrolled periodontitis
  • heavy smoker (>10 cigarettes/day)
  • unwilling to sign the informed consent

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
group1gap fillingsocket with intact buccal bone plate
group 2flap elevation and guided bone regenerationsocket with damaged buccal bone plate
group 2connective tissue graftsocket with damaged buccal bone plate
group1connective tissue graftsocket with intact buccal bone plate
group 2gap fillingsocket with damaged buccal bone plate
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
mucosa recessionbaseline to 1-year

The height of the crown was measured by a peridontal probe in mid-facial aspect. The difference of the height of the crown over time was calculated as mucosa recession

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
probing depthbaseline to 1-year

peri-implant probing depth detected by periodontal probe examined by a peridontal probe at six sites around the crown

bleeding on probingbaseline to 1-year

percentage of sites with bleeding on probing examined by a peridontal probe at six sites around the crown

Pink Esthetic Score (0-14)baseline to 1-year

Seven parameters were assessed:mesial papilla, distal papilla, soft tissue level, soft tissue contour, alveolar process deficiency, soft tissue color, and soft tissue texture. Each parameter was scored as 2,1,0.

thickness of buccal bone platebaseline to 1-year

the distance between the implant's facial contour and the outside surface of the buccal bone measured by cone beam computor tomograph.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Shanghai Ninth People's Hositpal

🇨🇳

Shanghai, Shanghai, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath