Immediate Implant Placement With or Without Buccal Bone Dehiscence
- Conditions
- Dental Implant Failed
- Interventions
- Procedure: gap fillingProcedure: flap elevation and guided bone regenerationProcedure: connective tissue graft
- Registration Number
- NCT05445986
- Lead Sponsor
- Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
- Brief Summary
Immediate implant placement has been advantageous in terms of reduced treatment time and fewer surgical interventions. Given the fact that the level of buccal bone acts as a major prognostic factor for IIP, the indications for immediate implant placement were suggested to be limited to intact alveolar sockets.In recent years, many attempts have been performed to compensate for the alveolar ridge resorption in immediate implant placement in compromised sockets. The clinical outcomes of IIP with guided tissue regeneration and connective tissue grafting using papilla preservation technique in compromised extraction sockets has not been previously reported.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 29
- patients with anterior failing teeth (from cainine to cainine) with the presence of neighbouring teeth
- sufficient bone volume to achieve primary stability at implant insertion
- with uncontrolled periodontitis
- heavy smoker (>10 cigarettes/day)
- unwilling to sign the informed consent
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description group1 gap filling socket with intact buccal bone plate group 2 flap elevation and guided bone regeneration socket with damaged buccal bone plate group 2 connective tissue graft socket with damaged buccal bone plate group1 connective tissue graft socket with intact buccal bone plate group 2 gap filling socket with damaged buccal bone plate
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method mucosa recession baseline to 1-year The height of the crown was measured by a peridontal probe in mid-facial aspect. The difference of the height of the crown over time was calculated as mucosa recession
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method probing depth baseline to 1-year peri-implant probing depth detected by periodontal probe examined by a peridontal probe at six sites around the crown
bleeding on probing baseline to 1-year percentage of sites with bleeding on probing examined by a peridontal probe at six sites around the crown
Pink Esthetic Score (0-14) baseline to 1-year Seven parameters were assessed:mesial papilla, distal papilla, soft tissue level, soft tissue contour, alveolar process deficiency, soft tissue color, and soft tissue texture. Each parameter was scored as 2,1,0.
thickness of buccal bone plate baseline to 1-year the distance between the implant's facial contour and the outside surface of the buccal bone measured by cone beam computor tomograph.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Shanghai Ninth People's Hositpal
🇨🇳Shanghai, Shanghai, China