跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01965314
NCT01965314终止不适用

Randomised Control Trial to Determine the Effect of Simulation Based Training on Initial Performance of Ultrasound Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Blockade in a Clinical Setting

Cork University Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 10 人开始时间: 2010年7月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
入组人数
10
试验地点
1
主要终点
positive total of procedural checklist items

研究概览

简要总结

Investigators hypothesize that virtual reality based training offers an additional learning benefit over standard training (using cadaveric dissection and human volunteers) in preparing novice anaesthetists to perform their first Ultrasound guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Blockade (USgABPB) in the clinical setting.

Investigators hope that this body of work will aid the development of a visuo-haptic simulator used to improved training of doctors in performing USgABPB. Ultimately any patient having this procedure carried out in the future should benefit. In particular it will avoid the need for novice trainees to practice new techniques on patients.

详细描述

Ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus blockade (USgABPB) is a commonly performed medical procedure which enables the performance of surgery on the upper limb without general anaesthesia. Its competent performance entails complex, simultaneous interactions between three processes. These are active management of the patient, acquisition and interpretation of ultrasound images, and the placement a needle tip close to specific nerves to facilitate deposition of local anaesthetic. Currently, the procedure is taught using two-dimensional drawings, cadaveric specimens, videos, 3D animations, live demonstrations, and/or supervised clinical practice. Simulated practice, using tofu-based or animal models, have been used to bridge the gap from knowledge to clinical performance. Training in medical procedural skills is currently undergoing important change. Factors including altered patient expectations and the European Working Time Directive (2000/34/EC amending Directive 93/104/EC) limit the number of clinical learning opportunities available to trainees. These changes are likely to decrease particularly the number of opportunities for trainees to learn and practice procedural skills in a clinical setting. The traditional Halstedian apprenticeship model of medical training is being challenged. In this model, training is associated with progressively less supervision as part of progressive independence. "See one, do one" is no longer an appropriate method for teaching procedural skills because patients are necessarily exposed to inexperienced practitioners. This model requires a large investment of time by both trainer and trainee in the clinical environment. Its application decreases the efficiency of operating room activity. These circumstances pose medical trainers and training bodies with a dilemma, a decrease in the number of individual opportunities implies that the total duration of training should increase or a lesser level of competence accepted at completion of training

Simulation has been used widely for training in and assessment of medical procedural skills. Applied to essential anaesthetic skills, simulation may be more efficient than the apprenticeship approach. This may offer a partial solution to the problem of limited clinical learning opportunities for USgPNB. Simulated practice with formative feedback has been shown to be of benefit in the rapid acquisition of basic ultrasound skills by inexperienced clinicians. Ultimately, the purpose of simulated practice of medical procedures is to enhance clinical performance. One proven important role for simulation is to prepare novice clinicians to bridge the gap between acquiring knowledge and initial clinical performance. Significantly, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently mandated that clinicians who perform carotid stenting using a particular stent should train to a defined level of proficiency on a simulator before they perform the procedure on a patient.

With institutional ethical approval and having obtained written informed consent from participants (patients and anaesthetists) 20 College of Anaesthetists (RCSI) affiliated trainees who have no experience of performing ultrasound guided regional anaesthesia will be recruited. Participating anaesthetists will provide baseline personal data including previous experience with peripheral nerve blockade and simulators, using a web-based collection facility (www.surveymonkey.com or similar). They will perform baseline psychomotor tests prior to beginning training. Baseline visuo-spatial ability will be assessed using the card rotation, cube comparison, and map planning tests (Educational Testing Service) or similar. Psychomotor ability will be assessed using a grooved pegboard (Lafayette Instruments, Lafayette, IN) or similar. All participating anaesthetists will receive standardized two hour didactic training encompassing relevant anatomy, ultrasound (physics, function and interpretation), pharmacology of relevant agents, indications/ contraindications of the block and complications of the procedure. Participants will be taught to perform USgABPB using a technique as described in Appendix IV and V of 'The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine and the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy Joint Committee Recommendations for Education and Training in Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia'. This technique uses a transverse (or short-axis) view, on ultrasound imaging, of the axillary brachial plexus and axillary blood vessels. The needle is inserted in a sterile fashion using an 'in-plane' approach, that is, the needle shaft and tip will remain visible on ultrasound view throughout it course towards the relevant nerves. Following this initial period of common training subjects will be randomly allocated (using computer generated random numbers) to one of two groups of equal size for additional training which will occur in parallel over a two hour period, namely a simulator trained group (SG) or a control group (CG). Following the educational intervention all subjects will be asked to give written feedback on the content and delivery of the session.

Traditional training TG subjects will be offered multimodal training. This will be comprised of demonstration by suitably trained individuals of relevant anatomy using pre-existing cadaveric samples, performing ultrasound scans of the relevant areas on volunteers under expert supervision, and the practice of needle insertion under ultrasound-guidance using commonly used tissue phantoms (turkey breasts). All ultrasound examinations performed on volunteers or during the clinical performance on patients will use a Sonosite M Turbo (or similar device) with a 7-12 MHz 38mm linear probe. This training session will last two hours.

Simulator training In addition to traditional training the SG group will participate in a period of simulator based training. Following initial familiarization with the simulator SG participants will identify relevant structures and follow their course in the virtual arm. They will insert a virtual needle into the virtual environment and advance it using an in-plane technique towards various target structures. They will be given immediate directed feedback by an expert and offered the opportunity for repetitive, deliberate practice. The simulator, which SG participants will use, will comprise of a PHANTOM Desktop (http://www.sensable.com/), an haptic immersive workbench and the H3D API (http://www.sensegraphics.se/). The SG subject will scan and perform procedure specific tasks on a virtual arm. The model of the arm will be informed using MRI or ultrasound supervolume DICOM datasets. This training session will last two hours.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • ASA grades I and II
  • Age 18-80 years
  • Capacity to consent
  • Already consented for ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus blockade
  • Body Mass index 20 - 26

排除标准

  • Parameters outside inclusion criteria
  • Contraindication to regional anaesthesia
  • Language barrier
  • Psychiatric history
  • Pregnancy

结局指标

主要结局

positive total of procedural checklist items

时间窗: As assessed by retrospective video analysis of procedure (from patient positioning to assessment of adequacy of block) by two blinded experts (within 6 months of procedure)

Yes or No which of the following elements were performed 1. Conducts clear pre-procedural consultation with patient 2. Obtains informed consent 3. Secures IV Access 4. Applies appropriate monitoring 5. Prepares equipment and emergency drugs appropriate for standard regional anaesthesia procedures 6. Selects appropriate local anaesthetic agents 7. Works with trained assistant 8. Prepares sterile Regional Trolley 9. Selects linear broadband transducer with 5-13MHz frequency 10. Uses US coupling gel and sterile cover 11. Uses 50 mm needle 12. Positions patient semi recumbent with head supported for comfort 13. Positions operative arm in-90° abduction and externally rotates and supports in comfortable position 14. Elevates bed position to appropriate level 15. Positions the performer and US screen on the operative side with the screen cephalad to the trolley etc...(limited by character count)

次要结局

  • procedural times((During procedure) From patient and equipment positioning to assessment of adequacy of block)
  • number of needle passes(during the procedure)
  • block success(within 15 mins of the procedure)
  • participating anaesthetist confidence levels(immediately following performance of the USgABPB (within 30 minutes))
  • patient satisfaction measure(prior to discharge from the post anaesthesia care unit (recovery room) - (not more than 2 hours following completion of surgical procedure requiring anaesthesia))
  • global rating scale (GRS) scores(On retrospective video analysis of procedure (from patient positioning to assessment of adequacy of block)by blinded observers (within 6 months of procedure))

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Owen O'Sullivan

Research Fellow, Department of Anaesthesia

Cork University Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验