Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01220245
NCT01220245
Completed
Not Applicable

Heparin-bonded Endoluminal Versus Surgical Femoropopliteal Bypass; a Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial

Rijnstate Hospital6 sites in 1 country129 target enrollmentOctober 2010

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Cardiovascular Diseases
Sponsor
Rijnstate Hospital
Enrollment
129
Locations
6
Primary Endpoint
Primary (and -assisted) patency
Status
Completed
Last Updated
5 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

In this multicentre Randomized Clinical Trial, the heparin-bonded endoluminal bypass will be compared to the surgical venous femoro-popliteal bypass, based on the non-inferiority principle for the patency. Besides equal patency, an improved quality of life is expected. Recruitment will take the first two years and patients will be followed during five years. Patients with an indication for surgical bypass, classified category 3-6 with a >50% stenosis or occlusion of the SFA over >/=10 cm in length will be included. At least one crural artery should be patent without significant lesions.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
October 2010
End Date
August 2020
Last Updated
5 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Rijnstate Hospital
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Michel Reijnen

Principal Investigator

Rijnstate Hospital

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age over 18 years
  • Informed consent
  • Novo stenosis, restenosis \>50% or occlusion of the native SFA, all \> 10cm in length
  • Patent popliteal artery at the upper margin of the patella to the trifurcation
  • Diameter native SFA and popliteal artery are 5.0-7.5 mm
  • Indication for surgical bypass
  • Distal run-off at least one crural artery without significant stenosis
  • Ankle-brachial index (ABI) at rest \< 0.8 in the study limb prior to procedure

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient unsuitable for administration of contrast agent
  • Pregnancy
  • Dementia or altered mental status that would prohibit giving conscious informed consent
  • Need for adjunctive major surgical or vascular procedures within one month
  • Untreated flow-limiting aortoiliac occlusive disease
  • Perioperative unsuccessful ipsilateral percutaneous vascular procedure to treat inflow disease just prior to enrollment
  • Femoral or popliteal aneurysm of target vessel
  • Non-arthrotic disease resulting in occlusion (e.g. embolism, Buerger's disease, vasculitis)
  • Severe medical comorbidities (untreated CAD/CHF, severe COPD, metastatic malignancies, dementia etc.) or other medical condition that would preclude compliance with study protocol
  • Major distal amputation (above the transmetatarsal) in the study limb

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Primary (and -assisted) patency

Time Frame: 5 years

Quality of life

Time Frame: 5 years

Secondary Outcomes

  • Re-intervention(5 years)
  • Secondary patency(5 years)
  • Clinical improvement(5 years)
  • Target lesion revascularisation(5 years)
  • Complications(5 years)

Study Sites (6)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials