Endoscopic eTEP Versus Open Rives-Stoppa
- Conditions
- Rectus DiastasisHernia, Ventral
- Interventions
- Procedure: Open Rives-StoppaProcedure: Endoscopic eTEP
- Registration Number
- NCT05446675
- Lead Sponsor
- AZ Alma
- Brief Summary
Observational cohort study (partially retrospective, partially prospective) comparing the endoscopic extended totally extraperitoneal prosthesis (eTEP) repair for midline abdominal hernias to open Rives-Stoppa repair (control).
- Detailed Description
See included study protocol. Included patients will be registered to the European Hernia Society (EHS) registry.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
Group 1 (eTEP):
- Participants who underwent an eTEP procedure in the investigators' center
- Preoperative existence of one or more midline abdominal wall hernias
- Preoperative existence of rectus abdominis diastasis
Group 2 (Rives-Stoppa, control group):
- Participants who underwent an open Rives-Stoppa (midline repair with sublay mesh) in the investigators' center
Group 1 (eTEP):
- Preoperative absence of midline abdominal wall hernias
- Preoperative absence of rectus abdominis diastasis
- Intraoperative performance of transverse abdominis release (TAR)
- Intraoperative inguinal hernia repair
Group 2 (Rives-Stoppa, control group):
- Intraoperative performance of transverse abdominis release (TAR)
- Intraoperative performance of anterior component separation
- Intraoperative inguinal hernia repair
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Rives-Stoppa, control Open Rives-Stoppa Thirty participants will be selected out of all patients who underwent an open Rives-Stoppa (midline repair with sublay mesh) in the investigators' center and who do not meet any of the exclusion criteria. Participant selection will consist of matching to participants in group 1 according to gender and age (e.g. a male participant in group 1 will be matched to a male participant (group 2) out of the investigators' records who underwent an open Rives-Stoppa repair and whose age most closely resembles the age of the matched participant in group 1). eTEP Endoscopic eTEP First 30 participants who meet the inclusion criteria and do not exhibit any of the exclusion criteria will be investigated. The option for endoscopic eTEP repair, if feasible, is given preoperatively as a standard for the treatment of symptomatic midline abdominal wall hernias with concomitant rectus abdominis diastasis as an alternative to open Rives-Stoppa mesh repair. The modality of operative treatment is made in cooperation with the participant.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Postoperative pain management From the end of surgery (moment of the end of operation) until the date of discharge from the hospital, assessed up to 30 days. Modality (type, generic name), duration (days), dosage (grams or milligrams) and frequency (times per day) of analgesics administration
Length of hospital stay From the date of operation until the date of discharge from the hospital, assessed up to 30 days. Time (days) spent within the hospital
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Intraoperative complications During surgery Adverse event occurrence
Postoperative complications After discharge until 30 days postoperative Adverse event occurrence by readmission
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
AZ Alma
🇧🇪Eeklo, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium