跳至主要内容
临床试验/TCTR20200828002
TCTR20200828002已完成2 期

Comparison of the effectiveness between Peripheral Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation and Conventional Therapy in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: a pilot randomized controlled trial

General Research Grant0 个研究点目标入组 24 人开始时间: 2020年8月28日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
2 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
24

研究概览

简要总结

The rPMS group showed significantly greater within group improvement in symptom severity scores and pinch strength. Regarding electrodiagnostic parameters, sensory nerve action potential amplitude was significantly increased within group treated with rPMS. There was no statistically significant within group difference in conventional therapy. Although overall changes in PMS group were of greater magnitude, no statistically significant difference was found when comparing between groups.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 N/A (No limit)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • The study included patients with age above 18
  • years with electrophysiological proof of having carpal tunnel syndrome (mild to moderate degree)

排除标准

  • 1.Patients with history of surgical release of carpal tunnel
  • 2.Patients with previous wrist fracture or wrist dislocation
  • 3.Patients with underlying disease such as diabetes mellitus, hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism and rheumatoid arthritis.
  • 4.Patients with history suggestive of any neurological disease such as polyneuropathy, cervical radiculopathy, ulnar neuropathy
  • 5.Patients with magnetic Stimulate contraindication such as installing pacemakers, cochlear implant or intracranial metal objects, pregnant females or those who are not consenting for the procedures.

研究者

发起方
General Research Grant

相似试验

Comparison of the effectiveness between Peripheral... | 临床试验