TCTR20230427005
Completed
Phase 2
Clinical, Patient-Reported outcomes and Efficacy of Static Computer-Assisted Sinus Floor Augmentation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Patients who need for implant placement in posterior maxilla with residual alveolar bone height between 1-5 mm
- Sponsor
- Chulalongkorn University
- Enrollment
- 40
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
o statistically significant difference was found between the two groups with regards to PROMs and intra-, post-operative complications, apart from higher level of swelling for SCA-SFA patients on day 2 after surgery. The use of SCA-SFA significantly reduced the time needed to conduct the window osteotomy (SCA 1113.80 + 730.41 sec vs SCA-SFA 685.50 + 285.28 sec) and the total surgery duration (SCA 4193.30 + 1204.98 sec vs SCA-SFA 3374.35 + 960.45 sec).
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •1\.Medically healthy adult (ASA I\-II) and age more than 21 years old
- •2\.Non\-smoker or previous smoker (quit more than 5 years) or light smoker with less than 10 cigarettes/day
- •3\.Edentulous spaces in posterior maxilla in 1 or 2 posterior quadrants with an alveolar bone defect which requires lateral approach sinus floor augmentation for 1\-3 implant placement (residual crestal height less than 6 mm)
- •4\.Absence of sinus membrane pathology or rhinosinusitis or other pathology requiring management
Exclusion Criteria
- •1\. Medically compromised subjects (ASA III\-V)
- •2\.General contraindications against implant treatment or augmentative procedures
- •(immunodeficiency or advanced systemic diseases or corticosteroid medication)
- •3\.Patients taking oral bisphosphonates longer than 5 years /anti\-angiogenic/RANKL inhibitor medications or receiving local radiotherapy
- •4\.Heavy smoker or previous heavy smoker (quit less than 5 years or more than 10 cigarettes/day)
- •5\.Acute/Chronic unmanaged symptomatic sinusitis
- •6\.Type 1 implant placement (immediate implant placement following extraction)
- •7\.Need for simultaneous soft tissue augmentation.
- •8\.Residual bone height more than 6 mm
- •9\.Subjects aged less than 21 years old
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Phase 2
Comparison of the effectiveness between Peripheral Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation and Conventional Therapy in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: a pilot randomized controlled trialsevere degree of carpal tunnel syndromecarpal tunnel syndromePeripheral Repetitive Magnetic StimulationTCTR20200828002General Research Grant24
Completed
Phase 4
Preoperative IV Versus Oral AcetaminophenPain, PostoperativeNCT03468920TriHealth Inc.120
Withdrawn
Phase 3
Non-Inferiority Comparison of Migrane® Versus Parcel ® For Treatment of Tensional CephaleiaTensional-type HeadacheNCT01408069EMS
Unknown
Not Applicable
Comparison of Patient Reported Outcome Measures Using the BREAST-Q Questionnaire in Patients Undergoing Pre Versus Sub-pectoral Implant Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction.Breast DiseaseBreast CancerPatient SatisfactionSurgeryNCT04842240The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust60
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparizon of the clinical results using two different suture technique during arthroscopic Bankart repair.recurrent anterior shoulder instabilityJPRN-UMIN000035425Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital40