Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03804281
NCT03804281UnknownNot Applicable

Clinical Evaluation of Gingival Margin Stability Following Conventional Versus Microsurgical Techniques of Esthetic Crown Lengthening

Cairo University0 sites24 target enrollmentStarted: February 1, 2019Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
24
Primary Endpoint
Mid-buccal gingival margin level

Study Overview

Brief Summary

the study compare gingival margin stability following conventional approach versus microsurgical approach of esthetic crown lengthening in management of patients with short clinical crowns in the upper anterior region.In management of patients with short clinical crowns in the upper anterior region, there is no difference in gingival margin stability between conventional and microsurgical approaches of esthetic crown lengthening.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients with healthy systemic condition.
  • •Adult patients ˃ 18 years old.
  • •The presence of the six upper anterior teeth.
  • •Absence of sites with attachment loss and probing depth (PD) >3 mm
  • •Keratinized gingiva of at least 2mm width.
  • •Compliance with good oral hygiene.
  • •Patients accepts 6-months follow-up period (cooperative patients).
  • •Patients provides an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Gummy smile with normal tooth proportions
  • •Presence of prosthetic crowns
  • •Extensive restorations
  • •Extensive incisal edge attrition.
  • •Misalignment on maxillary anterior teeth.
  • •Smokers ˃ 10 cigarettes / day.

Arms & Interventions

Test group

Experimental

esthetic crown lengthening with microsurgical approach

Intervention: Test group (Procedure)

Control group

Active Comparator

esthetic crown lengthening with conventional approach.

Intervention: Control group (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Mid-buccal gingival margin level

Time Frame: 6 months

periodontal probe with William's graduation will be used to measure the distance from the CEJ to the gingival margin at the mid-buccal surface

Secondary Outcomes

  • Pink Esthetic Score (PES)(6 months)
  • Post-Surgical swelling(7days)
  • Post-Surgical Patient Satisfaction: 3-item questionnaire(6 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Mohamed elshafie mohamed tawfiq hassan

Dentist

Cairo University

Similar Trials