Comparing Outcomes Between Early and Standard-of-care Delayed Cranioplasty After Decompressive Hemicraniectomy

This prospective, randomized study aims to comprehensively evaluate the impact of cranioplasty timing on postoperative complications and long-term functional outcomes following decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC). The primary endpoint focuses on comparing the rates of various postoperative complications, including infection, seizures, return to the operating room, and the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunting, between patients undergoing standard of care cranioplasty (>3 months after DHC) and those receiving early cranioplasty (within 8 weeks).

The primary endpoint involves a comprehensive evaluation of long-term functional outcomes at 6 months post-injury ("injury" defined as "acute traumatic injury or source of increased intracranial pressure secondary to stroke or intracranial hemorrhage"). This assessment aims to determine whether the timing of cranioplasty influences patients' neurological recovery, cognitive function, and overall quality of life. By comparing the outcomes of patients who undergo standard of care cranioplasty with those who undergo early cranioplasty, the study seeks to provide valuable insights into the potential benefits of the latter approach.

The findings of this research hold the potential to guide clinical practice and inform decision-making for patients who have undergone DHC. By considering a range of complications and incorporating a robust statistical framework, the study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the advantages and disadvantages associated with different cranioplasty timing strategies.