Evaluation of the effect of two incision techniques on the soft tissue dimensions around the implant
- Conditions
- Incision technique in implant insertion.
- Registration Number
- IRCT20231115060069N1
- Lead Sponsor
- Tehran University of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Pending
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 46
patients aging over 18 years who refer to the periodontics department of Tehran Faculty of Dentistry need implant placement in the edentulous area in anterior or posterior region in a delayed or late implantation.
The presence of teeth on the mesial or distal side or both sides of the edentulous area
patients without systemic conditions interfering with surgery (ASA 1 or 2)
Non-smokers or less than 10 cigarettes per day
presence of periodontal health (less than 4 areas with probe depth greater than 4 mm)
Fullmouth bleeding score and fullmouth plaque score less than 25%
Having informed consent
Pregnancy and lactation
Having diabetes
The need for an implant in the posterior second molar region
The tooth adjacent to the edentulous area have a clinical attachment loss of more than 2 mm
The need for simultaneous soft and hard tissue reconstruction and flap advancement at the time of implant placement
The implant adjacent to the free end edentulous area
The patient's lack of consent to continue cooperation in the research project
Severe side effects during treatment
The impossibility of placing the healing abutment on the day of surgery
Improper position of the implant
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Changes in the height of the papilla adjacent to the edentulous area. Timepoint: Baseline, 3 months after surgery. Method of measurement: image j software.;Changes in the volume of the papilla adjacent to the edentulous area. Timepoint: Baseline, 3 months after surgery. Method of measurement: image j software.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The presence of scar tissue. Timepoint: 3 months after surgery. Method of measurement: mucoal scarring index.;Implant position. Timepoint: Immediately after implant placement. Method of measurement: Parallel periapical radiograph.;The amount of gingival recession. Timepoint: At baseline, 3 months after surgery. Method of measurement: Michigan probe with Williams numbering as the difference in the distance of the gingival margin from the mucogingival line.;Probing depth. Timepoint: The baseline, 3 months after surgery. Method of measurement: Michigan probe with Williams numbering in buccal, lingual, mesial and distal points of adjacent teeth.