Comparison of two different types of supraglottic devices used while intubation .
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- ASA 1 and 2 undergoing elective surgeries.
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2018/05/013738
- Lead Sponsor
- DrHasmukh Patel
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 80
Inclusion Criteria
1.Mallampati grading 1 and 2
2.ASA-1 and 2
3.Weight 30-70 kg of either sex
Exclusion Criteria
1.Mallampati grading -3 and 4
2.ASA-3,4 and 5
3.Morbidly obese
4.Pregnant patient
5.Oesophageal pathology
6.URTI in past 10 days
7.K/C/O gastroesophageal reflux disease
8.Emergency surgeries
9.Patient not willing for participation
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.Insertion time of both devices. <br/ ><br>2.Number of attempts of insertion.Timepoint: 1.Appearence of first end tidal wave <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.Oropharyngeal leak pressure <br/ ><br>2.Ventilatory parametersTimepoint: 5 minutes after establishing airway. <br/ ><br>