COMPARE WHICH TECHNIQUE IS NETEER BETWEENCONVENTIONAL AND LASER TECHNIQUE TO PLACE IMPLANT AND TO CHECK IMPLANT STABILITY
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: R688- Other general symptoms and signs
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/10/037025
- Lead Sponsor
- PANINEEYA INSTITITE OF DENTAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH CENTRE
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Patients with good oral hygiene having missing tooth/teeth, with
the adjacent teeth free from peri-apical pathology.
Adequate bone height and bone width.
Systemically healthy patients.
Normal to thick gingival biotype
Patient who are smokers, alcoholic or drug abusers.
Suffering from bruxism.
Patients with vitamin D deficiency.
Immunocompromised patients.
Having a history of jaw irradiation or exhibited signs and
symptoms of any systemic diseases that could influence the
outcome of the therapy, were excluded in this study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method healing index at two stagesTimepoint: 7 th day and 14th day of first stage <br/ ><br>7 th day and 14 th day of second stage
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method implant stability and radiovisiographyTimepoint: implant stability at 3 months and 6 months <br/ ><br>radiovisiography at baseline 3 months and 6 months