MedPath

Review and comparison of ergonomic features of three types of insoles in prolonged standing tasks: a field study in a shoe manufacturing factory

Not Applicable
Conditions
Musculoskeletal Disorders.
Registration Number
IRCT20180902040923N2
Lead Sponsor
Iran University of Medical Sciences
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Pending
Sex
Male
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria

Gender of male subjects with age range between 40 to 50 years
Height and weight of 50th percentile
Having 2 years of standing work experience
People whose job requires standing for a long time (one shift). (In this study, a cutting job was selected for the study.)
Placement in the standard range of spinal curvatures (thoracic vertebral kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and cervical lordosis)

Exclusion Criteria

Absence of musculoskeletal disorders and problems
Absence of neurological defects
Lack of autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and ....
Absence of cardiovascular disorders
No history of doing heavy sports activities
Absence of congenital disorders in the foot area such as flat feet, excessive arch of the foot, wrist and knee deviations
No history of accidents and injuries in the foot area during the past year

Study & Design

Study Type
interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The amount of pain and discomfort in the lower extremities after using three types of insoles. Timepoint: The beginning and the end of each day. Method of measurement: Borg Pain Scale and Scale.;The amount of volumetric changes in the leg after using three types of insoles. Timepoint: The beginning and the end of each day. Method of measurement: Using the Gulick meter.;The amount of foot pressure distribution after using three types of insoles. Timepoint: the end of each day. Method of measurement: FSR sensors.
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath