CTRI/2021/09/036334Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Comparison of ease of intubation with airtraq, miller, and macintosh laryngoscope blades in children- a prospepective randomised trial
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
- KIMS
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •ASA grade 1 and 2
- •weight of 10 â?? 35 kg
- •Adequate mouth opening
- •Various elective surgerical procedures under general anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients with active upper / lower respiratory tract infections
- •Risk of aspiration
- •Severe systemic disease
- •Anticipated difficult airway
- •Potiential and actual cervical spine injury
- •Laryngeal trauma
- •Coagulopathy
Investigators
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison between Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscope in tracheal intubation required for general anaesthesiaCTRI/2018/05/013760Seth G s medical college and KEM hospital70
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Compare two techniques for putting the tube in the windpipe to give anaesthesiaCTRI/2022/02/040447Postgraduate institute of medical education and research
Completed
Phase 2
Comparison of Intubation Conditions between three different types of laryngoscopes during rapid sequence induction intubation.CTRI/2018/10/015874IMS HOSPITA307
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of Airway Scope and Videolight wand laryngoscope in patients with cervical immobilisation by a semi-rigid collarPatients scheduled for various surgical procedures requiring tracheal intubation as part of anaesthesiaAnaesthesiology - AnaestheticsACTRN12610001096044jie ae kim100
Not yet recruiting
Unknown
Comparision of two different types of equipment used to insert a tube in the wind pipe of a patient undergoing general anaesthesia with anticipated difficult airwayCTRI/2023/09/057939Dr Lekhashree B K