MedPath

Comparison of IPC Therapy as an Alternative or an Adjunct to MLD Within CDT for BCRL

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema
BCRL
Registration Number
NCT07154043
Lead Sponsor
Pamukkale University
Brief Summary

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide and lymphedema is one of its most significant complications. Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) may develop shortly after treatment or even years later, causing physical and psychological burden, functional impairment, and reduced quality of life. Complete decongestive therapy (CDT), which includes manual lymph drainage (MLD), compression, skin care, and exercise, is the standard approach. Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) has been proposed as an additional option, and current consensus reports emphasize the need for studies evaluating IPC in combination with MLD.

Previous studies comparing IPC and MLD, either alone or in combination, have shown inconsistent results. Some reported no significant difference between treatment groups, while others suggested additional benefits of IPC, particularly in reducing limb heaviness and tension. However, there is still insufficient evidence to clarify the exact role of IPC within CDT.

The aim of this study is to investigate the acute effects of using IPC instead of MLD, or in combination with MLD, on arm circumference, arm volume, shoulder range of motion, and quality of life in patients with BCRL.

Detailed Description

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women worldwide and remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women. Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is one of the most important complications of breast cancer treatment. It may occur due to lymphatic system damage caused by surgery and/or radiotherapy, or as a result of tumor-related lymphangiogenesis, leading to interstitial fluid accumulation. BCRL can develop immediately after treatment or months to years later.

BCRL is associated with swelling, heaviness, discomfort, weakness, increased risk of infection, and progressive chronicity, which together result in upper extremity dysfunction and reduced quality of life. Compared with women without lymphedema, patients with BCRL report more frequent pain, decreased shoulder mobility, reduced upper extremity strength, impaired daily activities, and sensory disturbances.

The standard treatment for BCRL is complete decongestive therapy (CDT), which consists of manual lymph drainage (MLD), compression, skin care, and exercise. Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) has also been proposed as a treatment option, and the 2023 consensus report of the International Society of Lymphology emphasized the need for further studies evaluating IPC in combination with MLD.

However, the number of studies directly comparing IPC with MLD, or evaluating their combined use, is limited and results remain inconsistent. Some trials reported no significant difference between MLD and IPC in terms of limb volume reduction, while others demonstrated additional benefits of IPC in relieving heaviness and tension. The role of IPC in CDT, whether as a replacement for MLD or as an adjunct, is not yet clearly defined.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the acute effects of using IPC instead of MLD, or in combination with MLD, within CDT on arm circumference, arm volume, shoulder range of motion, and quality of life in patients with BCRL.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
45
Inclusion Criteria
  • Female gender
  • Patients aged 18-65 years
  • Having a history of unilateral mastectomy and lymph node dissection at least one year ago due to breast cancer diagnosis.
  • Having unilateral breast cancer-related upper extremity lymphedema (>20% volume difference between the two upper extremities or >2 cm difference in circumference at any measured point) according to the diagnostic criteria of the International Society of Lymphology (Committee 2023) for at least six months.
  • Not having received lymphedema treatment or exercise therapy for the last six months
  • Completing breast cancer primary treatment at least 6 months ago (except hormone therapy/aromatase inhibitors)
Exclusion Criteria
  • Bilateral breast cancer
  • Bilateral axillary lymph node dissection
  • Metastatic breast cancer
  • Receiving ongoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy
  • Primary or bilateral lymphedema
  • Having active cancer
  • Presence of stage 3 lymphedema
  • Uncontrolled serious systemic disease (cardiopulmonary diseases, arterial or venous diseases, renal dysfunction, uncontrolled hypertension or hypotension, cardiac arrhythmia, scleroderma, Sudek's atrophy).
  • Current or recent (within the last 3 months) infection (cellulitis, lymphangitis) or deep venous thrombosis
  • Presence of open wounds
  • Using medications that may affect body fluid and electrolyte balance (diuretics, etc.).
  • Individuals with serious mental and sensory problems
  • Being pregnant
  • Body mass index >40 kg/m2

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Arm volumetric measurements1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation

Arm volume will be calculated using circumferential measurements taken with a standard 7 mm measuring tape at 4 cm intervals along the arm. Segmental arm volumes (mL-cm³) will be calculated using the simplified frustum formula (Frustum Model). This formula, as described by Sitzia et al., has shown high correlation with water displacement measurements and is widely used in the literature as a valid and reliable indirect method for assessing lymphedema.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Shoulder Range of Motion1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation

Goniometric measurements of the affected shoulder will be performed to assess flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal rotation, and external rotation in patients with lymphedema.

Quality of Life Measurement ULL-271 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation

ULL-27 quality of life questionnaire, developed specifically for upper extremity lymphedema patients. The scale has physical, psychological and social dimensions. It consists of 27 questions. A high score on the scale indicates that lymphedema negatively affects the quality of life.

Arm Circumference Measurements1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation

To assess lymphedema severity, circumferential measurements of the affected and unaffected upper extremities will be performed. Patients' forearms will be in a supine position, elbows fully extended, and arms abducted at 90 degrees. Arm-hand circumference will be measured at four points: metacarpal region, wrist, 10 cm below the lateral epicondyle, and 15 cm above the lateral epicondyle, using a non-stretchable 7 mm tape of 150 cm length. Measurements will be taken on both upper extremities, and the differences between sides will be recorded in centimeters.

Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick-DASH) Questionnaire1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation

The Quick-DASH is an 11-item questionnaire used to assess activity limitations of the upper extremity in patients with lymphedema related to breast cancer. Each item is scored from 1 to 5, and total scores are summed. A total score of 0 indicates no disability, while a score of 100 indicates the highest level of disability. The Turkish version was validated in 2011 and has been found valid and reliable for assessing upper extremity activity limitations in breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Upper Extremity Swelling (Visual Analog Scale)1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation

Swelling in the affected extremity will be assessed using a 0-10 cm (0-100 mm) horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A score of 0 indicates no symptom, and 10 cm indicates the most severe presence of the symptom. Participants will mark the severity of each symptom and the discomfort caused by the symptom on the VAS ("0" = no complaint, "10" = maximal complaint). The mark will be measured in centimeters with a ruler. The VAS is a valid and reliable method for measuring experimental and clinical pain as well as lymphedema-specific symptoms, and it is sensitive to small changes in symptom intensity.

Upper Extremity Heaviness (Visual Analog Scale)1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation

Heaviness in the affected extremity will be assessed using a 0-10 cm (0-100 mm) horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A score of 0 indicates no symptom, and 10 cm indicates the most severe presence of the symptom. Participants will mark the severity of each symptom and the discomfort caused by the symptom on the VAS ("0" = no complaint, "10" = maximal complaint). The mark will be measured in centimeters with a ruler. The VAS is a valid and reliable method for measuring experimental and clinical pain as well as lymphedema-specific symptoms, and it is sensitive to small changes in symptom intensity.

Upper Extremity Tightness (Visual Analog Scale)1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation

Tightness in the affected extremity will be assessed using a 0-10 cm (0-100 mm) horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A score of 0 indicates no symptom, and 10 cm indicates the most severe presence of the symptom. Participants will mark the severity of each symptom and the discomfort caused by the symptom on the VAS ("0" = no complaint, "10" = maximal complaint). The mark will be measured in centimeters with a ruler. The VAS is a valid and reliable method for measuring experimental and clinical pain as well as lymphedema-specific symptoms, and it is sensitive to small changes in symptom intensity.

Perceived Improvement3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation

Patients' perceived improvement will be measured using the Patient Global Perceived Improvement Scale, asking participants to compare their current condition with baseline regarding lymphedema (1 = much better, 2 = better, 3 = slightly better, 4 = no change, 5 = slightly worse, 6 = worse, 7 = much worse). The Turkish version of this scale was validated and culturally adapted by Yalçın et al. in 2003, showing good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.79) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.75).

Upper Extremity Pain (Visual Analog Scale)1 day before rehabilitation and 3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation

Pain in the affected extremity will be assessed using a 0-10 cm (0-100 mm) horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A score of 0 indicates no symptom, and 10 cm indicates the most severe presence of the symptom. Participants will mark the severity of each symptom and the discomfort caused by the symptom on the VAS ("0" = no complaint, "10" = maximal complaint). The mark will be measured in centimeters with a ruler. The VAS is a valid and reliable method for measuring experimental and clinical pain as well as lymphedema-specific symptoms, and it is sensitive to small changes in symptom intensity.

Patient Satisfaction3 weeks after the start of rehabilitation

Patient satisfaction with the exercise programs will be assessed using a 4-point Likert scale (0 = not satisfied, 1 = slightly satisfied, 2 = satisfied, 3 = very satisfied).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Pamukkale University

Denizli, Turkey (Türkiye)

Pamukkale University
Denizli, Turkey (Türkiye)

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.