Visual Feedback to Improve Balance During Walking
- Conditions
- Other FallPatient Falls
- Interventions
- Procedure: Treadmill WalkingOther: Visual Feedback
- Registration Number
- NCT01690611
- Lead Sponsor
- Temple University
- Brief Summary
The goal of this research is to determine if real time visual feedback of body movements improves balance control more than walking on a treadmill alone. Individuals participating in this research study will be tested using a battery of clinical strength and balance assessments twice before a 4 week training period and once after the training period. The 4 week training period will consist of 12 sessions walking on a treadmill. The experimental group will see real time visual feedback regarding their body movements, and the control group will not receive this visual feedback. Following the 4 week training each participant will again be tested using the battery of clinical strength and balance assessments.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
- Fall Prone Older Adults (history of falls or loss of balance)
- ability to walk on the treadmill hands-free without assistance
- Mini-Mental Status Exam > 23
- Current enrollment in physical rehabilitation of any kind
- Medically unstable
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Walking & No Visual Feedback Treadmill Walking Individuals in this arm will walk on a treadmill without viewing real time visual feedback regarding their body motion. Walking & Visual Feedback Visual Feedback Individuals in this arm will walk on a treadmill while viewing real time visual feedback regarding their body motions and use the visual feedback to correct their body motions. Walking & Visual Feedback Treadmill Walking Individuals in this arm will walk on a treadmill while viewing real time visual feedback regarding their body motions and use the visual feedback to correct their body motions.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from Baseline in 6 Minute Walk Test Tested at 0, 4, and 8 weeks Change from Baseline in Berg Balance Test Score Test will be given at 0, 4, and 8 weeks Change from Baseline in BESTest Score, A clinical assessment of balance Tested at 0, 4, and 8 weeks Balance Evaluation System Test (BESTest)
Change from Baseline in Activity Specific Balance Confidence Score Tested at 0, 4, and 8 weeks Questionnaire rating balance confidence
Change from Baseline in Comfortable Walking Speed Measured daily, up to 12 days This value is determined for each training session
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from Baseline in Center of Mass variability Tested daily, up to 12 days This measure is derived from recorded body position during each training repetition for each of up to 12 days of training.
Change from Baseline in Overground Walking Speed Tested at 0, 4, and 8 weeks Change from Baseline in Single/Dual Tasking ability Tested at 0, 4, and 8 weeks Change from Baseline in Muscle Strength Tested at 0, 4, and 8 weeks Strength of major muscles in the legs and trunk will be measured
Change from Baseline in Power spectral density Tested daily, up to 12 days This measure is derived from recorded body position during each training repetition for each of up to 12 days of training.
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Pearson Hall, Temple University
🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Collington Episcopal Life Care Community
🇺🇸Mitchellville, Maryland, United States