跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02329938
NCT02329938已完成不适用

Desarda Versus Lichtenstein's Repair for Inguinal Hernia: a Comparative Study

Mansoura University0 个研究点目标入组 155 人开始时间: 2010年12月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
155
主要终点
number of patients with recurrence of inguinal hernia

研究概览

简要总结

Unlike Lichtenstein tension free repair for inguinal hernia, Desarda's repair was introduced as a pure tissue repair with no need for mesh. In other words; the complications which may arise from the use of a foreign body (mesh) will be avoided. The idea was to evaluate the efficacy of this new repair and compare it to the standard Lichtenstein repair.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • inguinal hernia

排除标准

  • recurrent inguinal hernia
  • giant inguinal hernia
  • mental disorder
  • refusal to participate

结局指标

主要结局

number of patients with recurrence of inguinal hernia

时间窗: 2 years

次要结局

  • VAS score for pain(one year)
  • number of patients develped postoperative complications(2 years)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Tamer Youssef Mohamed

assistant professor of surgery

Mansoura University

相似试验

Desarda Repair for Inguinal Hernia | 临床试验