Mesh Free Desarda Repair Compared With Lichtenstein Repair for the Treatment of Primary Inguinal Hernias
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 82
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Postoperative pain
研究概览
简要总结
The Lichtenstein technique for hernia repair is safe and simple, but the underlying mesh prosthesis has its setbacks, as it acts as a mechanical barrier5. The mesh does not provide mobile and the physiologically dynamic posterior wall. The most dangerous complication associated with the mesh prosthesis is its migration from the abdominal cavity's primary implantation site. The relatively knew technique developed by Dr. Desarda does not utilize the synthetic mesh rather it uses a strip of external oblique aponeurosis to strengthen the posterior wall. Our study has compared the two methods regarding various aspects.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Investigator)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20 Years 至 70 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Patients of age between 20 to 70years
- •A primary inguinal hernia
- •Consented to participate in the research.
排除标准
- •Age below 20,
- •Recurrent and pantaloons hernia
- •Patients who did not give the informed consent
- •Patients who lose the follow-up
结局指标
主要结局
Postoperative pain
时间窗: 3 months after the primary surgery
Measured on Visual analogue scale (VAS) where 0 meaning no pain and 10 means worst pain
Recurrence
时间窗: Within 01 year of the primary surgery
Described as reappearance of the inguinal hernia on the operated side
次要结局
- Wound complication(Complications occuring within 30 days after the surgery)
研究者
Muhammad Usman Ghani
SENIOR REGISTRAR SURGERY
Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi