Comparison of PEEP Effect on Perioperative Oxygenation and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Lithotomy Position
- Conditions
- Lung UltrasoundPositive End Expiratory Pressure
- Interventions
- Diagnostic Test: PEEPDiagnostic Test: ZEEP
- Registration Number
- NCT05261295
- Lead Sponsor
- Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
- Brief Summary
The main purpose of the study is to compare the effectiveness of PEEP application in terms of perioperative oxygenation level in the use of classical LMA and i-gel, which is often preferred. The secondary aim is to compare parameters such as gastric insufflation and the rate of postoperative pulmonary complication development in the case of PEEP with two supraglottic airway devices.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 128
- ASA I-III
- Patients who will undergo transurethral resection of the bladder and prostate taken in the lithotomy position, ureter and kidney stone operations with ureteroscopy
- Heart failure (ejection fraction < 40%),
- unstable hemodynamic conditions
- Having neck or upper respiratory tract pathology,
- have an increased risk of aspiration (gastroesophageal reflux disease, full stomach, acidity),
- obesity (body mass index≥30 kg m-2)
- Patients with poor tooth structure will also be excluded.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Classical LMA PEEP Patients who received general anesthesia with classical LMA Classical LMA ZEEP Patients who received general anesthesia with classical LMA i-Gel PEEP Patients who received general anesthesia with i-Gel i-Gel ZEEP Patients who received general anesthesia with i-Gel
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method LUS score preop Baseline Loss of ventilation will be evaluated by calculating the LUS score. Each region will be scored according to the LUS model as follows: Presence of lung deviation with lines or less than two isolated B-lines is scored as 0; 1 point in the presence of more than one well-defined B line; presence of more than one combined B line, 2 points; and when a tissue pattern characterized by dynamic air bronchograms (lung consolidation) is presented, the score is 3. The worst ultrasound pattern observed in each region will be recorded and used to calculate the sum of the scores.
LUS score postoperative postoperative 1.hour Loss of ventilation will be evaluated by calculating the LUS score. Each region will be scored according to the LUS model as follows: Presence of lung deviation with lines or less than two isolated B-lines is scored as 0; 1 point in the presence of more than one well-defined B line; presence of more than one combined B line, 2 points; and when a tissue pattern characterized by dynamic air bronchograms (lung consolidation) is presented, the score is 3. The worst ultrasound pattern observed in each region will be recorded and used to calculate the sum of the scores.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method