MedPath

Comparison of PEEP Effect on Perioperative Oxygenation and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Lithotomy Position

Conditions
Lung Ultrasound
Positive End Expiratory Pressure
Interventions
Diagnostic Test: PEEP
Diagnostic Test: ZEEP
Registration Number
NCT05261295
Lead Sponsor
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Brief Summary

The main purpose of the study is to compare the effectiveness of PEEP application in terms of perioperative oxygenation level in the use of classical LMA and i-gel, which is often preferred. The secondary aim is to compare parameters such as gastric insufflation and the rate of postoperative pulmonary complication development in the case of PEEP with two supraglottic airway devices.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
128
Inclusion Criteria
  • ASA I-III
  • Patients who will undergo transurethral resection of the bladder and prostate taken in the lithotomy position, ureter and kidney stone operations with ureteroscopy
Exclusion Criteria
  • Heart failure (ejection fraction < 40%),
  • unstable hemodynamic conditions
  • Having neck or upper respiratory tract pathology,
  • have an increased risk of aspiration (gastroesophageal reflux disease, full stomach, acidity),
  • obesity (body mass index≥30 kg m-2)
  • Patients with poor tooth structure will also be excluded.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Classical LMAPEEPPatients who received general anesthesia with classical LMA
Classical LMAZEEPPatients who received general anesthesia with classical LMA
i-GelPEEPPatients who received general anesthesia with i-Gel
i-GelZEEPPatients who received general anesthesia with i-Gel
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
LUS score preopBaseline

Loss of ventilation will be evaluated by calculating the LUS score. Each region will be scored according to the LUS model as follows: Presence of lung deviation with lines or less than two isolated B-lines is scored as 0; 1 point in the presence of more than one well-defined B line; presence of more than one combined B line, 2 points; and when a tissue pattern characterized by dynamic air bronchograms (lung consolidation) is presented, the score is 3. The worst ultrasound pattern observed in each region will be recorded and used to calculate the sum of the scores.

LUS score postoperativepostoperative 1.hour

Loss of ventilation will be evaluated by calculating the LUS score. Each region will be scored according to the LUS model as follows: Presence of lung deviation with lines or less than two isolated B-lines is scored as 0; 1 point in the presence of more than one well-defined B line; presence of more than one combined B line, 2 points; and when a tissue pattern characterized by dynamic air bronchograms (lung consolidation) is presented, the score is 3. The worst ultrasound pattern observed in each region will be recorded and used to calculate the sum of the scores.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath